HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » April 29th!! Jane Sanders...

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:31 PM

 

April 29th!! Jane Sanders: "Our Taxes Are Being Checked and Will Be Out" (HRC GROUP)

Last edited Wed May 11, 2016, 11:14 AM - Edit history (2)

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2016-04-29/jane-sanders-our-taxes-are-being-checked-and-will-be-out

Jane Sanders: Our Taxes Are Being Checked and Will Be Out




Still waiting!

45 replies, 1878 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 45 replies Author Time Post
Reply April 29th!! Jane Sanders: "Our Taxes Are Being Checked and Will Be Out" (HRC GROUP) (Original post)
Her Sister Apr 2016 OP
leftofcool Apr 2016 #1
Her Sister Apr 2016 #2
DesertRat Apr 2016 #14
DURHAM D Apr 2016 #3
Her Sister Apr 2016 #4
UtahLib Apr 2016 #5
puffy socks May 2016 #30
yallerdawg Apr 2016 #6
KitSileya Apr 2016 #7
2naSalit Apr 2016 #11
sarae Apr 2016 #21
LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #8
SharonClark Apr 2016 #9
BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #10
George II Apr 2016 #20
BlueMTexpat May 2016 #23
kstewart33 Apr 2016 #12
DesertRat Apr 2016 #13
Her Sister Apr 2016 #15
sarae Apr 2016 #22
NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #16
Koinos Apr 2016 #17
Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #18
George II Apr 2016 #19
Her Sister May 2016 #24
liberal N proud May 2016 #25
Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #26
Her Sister May 2016 #27
puffy socks May 2016 #34
William769 May 2016 #28
Koinos May 2016 #29
misterhighwasted May 2016 #31
Koinos May 2016 #39
Her Sister May 2016 #40
Her Sister May 2016 #32
MattP May 2016 #33
Her Sister May 2016 #36
hamsterjill May 2016 #35
Koinos May 2016 #37
hamsterjill May 2016 #43
Koinos May 2016 #44
nini May 2016 #38
Koinos May 2016 #41
Koinos May 2016 #42
Treant May 2016 #45

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:33 PM

1. They are having the back years "checked"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftofcool (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:34 PM

2. The video is awful.

 

You can tell the interviewer is not buying, though!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Reply #2)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:52 PM

14. Mark Halpern has had her on a couple of other times

You can tell that he's not buying into her lying and deflecting!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:35 PM

3. Jane lied and lost her job so

one can only assume she fudged their taxes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:37 PM

4. This video!! argh!

 

Ummm giggle giggle ummm laugh (serious question) big smile ummmm! giggle giggle ummmm! smile big smile giggle

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:39 PM

5. Naughty, naughty Jane. We see you. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UtahLib (Reply #5)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:39 AM

30. Yeah but

 

Hillary's speeches! the unfair establishment! the DNC! Paid Brock Hillbots!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:44 PM

6. Can you believe...

her husband has left her hung out to dry on this issue?

I can't remember any other national candidate ever saying, "Don't ask me - see my wife," on any subject!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yallerdawg (Reply #6)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:10 PM

7. Another example of the inherent misogynism of the campaign

Can you imagine the reaction if HRC had said that - that that was her husband's job? She'd be crucified, that's what.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KitSileya (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:44 PM

11. Thta's new and interesting since I

distinctly recall Bernie stating in one of the debates that it was Jane who did their taxes and he'd have to defer to her on that. Then he unequivocally PROMISED that they would be out soon. like within a week... and that was a couple days before rushing off to not have a sit-down with the Pope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KitSileya (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:30 PM

21. YES

So true – people would be calling for her head! Once again, there's one standard for everyone else, and a different one for HRC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:14 PM

8. Why do they need to be checked?

What has been filed is what they should release. They should not modify them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #8)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:19 PM

9. Exactly!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #8)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:31 PM

10. The only ones that might

need to be checked over are for 2015. I know that we always double and triple-check before we file and I don't believe that they have filed the 2015 returns yet.

But why would returns from prior to 2014 require checking?



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueMTexpat (Reply #10)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:26 PM

20. She told Andrea Mitchell 2 weeks ago that they weren't going to file for an extension.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #20)

Sun May 1, 2016, 04:20 AM

23. I have wondered about that remark ...

did she even realize that she effectively has requested one? Even if not in writing. Or perhaps they'll be able to say that they were out of the country on April 15 since that was the day the entire family went to Rome, ultimately to waylay the Pope on his way to Lesbos.

I realize that the actual deadline this year was April 18. But in view of the Pope visit on April 15, perhaps the IRS will cut them some slack so that they won't be subject to a late filing fee.

Some remarks that Jane and Bernie have made recently make me wonder whether either one or both might be at least one egg short of a dozen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:07 PM

12. Why the delay, delay, delay?

A $200,000 severance deal after being fired from a college that is struggling to stay financially afloat.

Preaching about income inequality and poverty....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:51 PM

13. Watch her eyes as she deflects the question

Imo, she is hiding something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DesertRat (Reply #13)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:55 PM

15. and she starts laughing like something is funny!

 

Keeps saying: "Don't worry about it" "Don't worry about it" -about the taxes. Ugh!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Reply #15)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:34 PM

22. That's really annoying.

Don't worry about it?! Especially when she (or her husband) follows it with a comment about how HRC should release transcripts.

You just know that if HRC did release transcripts, they'd come up with some other crap she needs to make available to the public. As if her whole life isn't already out there for everyone to see!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:11 PM

16. Clearly she doesn't want to talk about taxes

She interrupts the interviewer to tell him what SHE wants to talk about. Guess what, Jane; it doesn't work that way. They ask, you answer. Or tell them you refuse to answer. Avoiding the question only makes you look stupid and dishonest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:22 PM

17. Have they thrown the IRS and the FEC under the bus yet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:39 PM

18. I am just wondering, has Jane taken over all of the interviews? I have seen her

On several occasions, is Bernie just too tired or does he see the end result and is tired of fighting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:24 PM

19. She said this year's tax returns would be released WHEN THEY ARE DUE, which was April 18....

...if she just submitted them, why do they have to be checked out? Did she submit false or incorrect tax returns just 12 days ago?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 09:37 AM

24. RELEASE THE TAXES!

 

Isn't she in Vermont! Has anyone heard from Jane lately!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 10:26 AM

25. Jane Sanders lied!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 10:48 AM

26. This story should be paired with the story on Trumps refusal to post his tax papers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #26)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:00 AM

27. Yes! Neither BS nor Trump releasing!

 

We need transparency from these two!

Jane said over a week ago that she was going to release more taxes!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:02 AM

28. Makes one wonder what they are hiding.

Surely they cannot be that inept.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #28)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:21 AM

29. Let me guess, for starters:

1. Severance pay ($200,000) for Jane from Burlington College (2011 or 2012 filing year).

2. Other benefits paid to Jane from Burlington College (besides severance).

3. Campaign funds paid to Jane for her "consultant" work for Bernie's campaign (what is she worth?).

4. $4000 paid again to Jane as alternate member of toxic waste committee (re Sierra Blanco).

5. Rents from multiple properties (what assets were they taking so many deductions for?).

Jane does the taxes, and Jane has the embarrassing stuff to hide (including assets producing income). That's why I think that Bernie would be willing to let her take the blame, even though he also signed the forms. But he isn't good at "math and numbers" (shown by his tax and spend proposals), so it wasn't his fault.

ETA: They probably should have chosen "married filing separately" status.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Koinos (Reply #29)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:43 AM

31. All the Above.

I'm betting there are also a few surprises that would torpedo what's left of his sad limping campaign.

Isn't today the FEC deadline too? May 11th.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to misterhighwasted (Reply #31)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:34 PM

39. His response to the FEC inquiry about illicit contributions (re March monthly report) is due today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to misterhighwasted (Reply #31)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:36 PM

40. Even more FEC violations as of yesterday May 10th!

 

I just posted a new OP:
NEW! FEC releases damning 639 pages of violations by Bernie Sanders campaign (HRC GP)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107130374

and yes Today May 11th is a deadline for the FEC letter about a month or so ago!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Koinos (Reply #29)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:50 AM

32. Plus: Jane Sanders personally financially benefits from shipping Vermont's toxic nuclear waste to be

 

Radioactive: Tax Return Confirms Bernie Sanders Has Financial Stake in Nuclear Waste Dumping

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/4/18/tax-return-confirms-sanders-financial-stake-in-toxic-nuclear-dump

Bernie Sanders released his 2014 tax returns this weekend, and in addition to having claiming massive mortgage interest and property tax deductions vastly outstripping the average American - and certainly the average Vermonter - the tax returns seem to confirm a dark open secret in the Sanders family: Jane Sanders personally financially benefits from shipping Vermont's toxic nuclear waste to be dumped elsewhere.

For a quick refresher, refer back to our coverage of Bernie Sanders' eager support for Congressional legislation to expedite movement of Vermont's nuclear waste to Texas as well as his cavalier disregard for Texans and Vermonters who opposed the dump. We reported then that though Congress did not designate a specific site, the Congressional record was abundantly clear on where the likely site of the dump would be, near the low-income Latino community of Sierra Blanca. The protests of many progressives, including Paul Welstone's, fell on Bernie Sanders' deaf ears. The community, however, stood up and fought back. And, they won.

Besides from being eager to make his state's nuclear waste someone else's problem in a hurry, TPV writer Kris Jirapinyo noted that Jane O. Sanders, Bernie Sanders' wife, conveniently sat on the Board of Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority, or TLLRWDA, the entity which technically held the power to designate the dump site.

That much we already knew. Now, in light of Bernie Sanders' release of his 2014 taxes, we know that that Bernie and Jane Sanders financially benefit from her position on a Board that participates in willful poisoning of communities despite ample warning. According to their own tax return, Jane Sanders "materially participated" in the board, and received compensation.

For a candidate who cannot breathe a full sentence without baselessly accusing his opponent of taking money from special interests, the discovery that he and his wife financially benefit from nuclear toxic waste dumping is... really... something.


http://static1.squarespace.com/static/530becede4b093256168fba5/t/57157f4bd210b8f8e176a616/1461026658874/?format=750w

http://static1.squarespace.com/static/530becede4b093256168fba5/t/57157f4bd210b8f8e176a616/1461026658874/?format=1500w

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 11:52 AM

33. He promised right before the vatican trip they would be out tomorrow

He has never released a full return they lied and said he has released full returns in the past, if he ever was full vetted who knows

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MattP (Reply #33)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:08 PM

36. While on his return from the Vatican trip the 2014 taxes were released

 

but then on April 29th as in the OP video Jane sanders said at the end of that interview that she was releasing more soon. That is about a week and a half ago! What happened!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:03 PM

35. The idea of releasing tax returns is a common act in Presidential elections.

When the Bernie camp acts like it's been a surprise to them that they are expected to release tax returns, it makes me wonder what ELSE they haven't considered for him to become President.

Surely, a good President would need the ability to foresee issues and be prepared.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hamsterjill (Reply #35)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:26 PM

37. His campaign does seem like "amateur hour" sometimes.

His foreign policy preparation seems very weak, and even his grasp of financial issues appears quite superficial. I think he just hasn't done his homework.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Koinos (Reply #37)

Wed May 11, 2016, 01:40 PM

43. It does!

I've often wondered if they ever truly expected to get this far. I think when Bernie started, before he became so hostile, his purpose was to move the platform to the left. I'm not sure that I believe he has ever fully assessed what would be required of him to actually BE President.

When he's asked about his own agenda, he gives the same, tired answers - and somehow manages to get into every snippet how his average donation is $27! That doesn't tell ME how he is planning to deal with North Korea. He wants to break up the banks, but I've yet to understand what he'll do as replacement.

He wants to give free healthcare to everyone, which I applaud, but to do that, based on the information that he's given as to his proposals, will cost me $8,000 more per year in taxes with me reaping little to no benefit from that increased taxation. I can't afford that, and I am no where near wealthy.

If Kim Jong Un attacks us, I'd like to know that Bernie will be willing to do more than just have a group hug. Bernie never seems to answer that - he only repeats and repeats and repeats that he is against war. Well, we are ALL against war. But what would he do if war is thrust upon the United States and we have no choice about it.

I don't get a comfort level from him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hamsterjill (Reply #43)

Wed May 11, 2016, 01:42 PM

44. Excellent post!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:33 PM

38. What a damn joke

these two are pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:36 PM

41. The irony is that his whole campaign focuses on "money" and income inequality.

And he can't seem to get his own financial house in order (taxes and campaign funds).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 12:53 PM

42. And more FEC violations in this latest report, posted thanks to Her Sister!

Wow! Six hundred thirty-nine pages of violations!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107130374

His campaign may owe more than it can pay out at this point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2016, 02:39 PM

45. Still waitin'.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread