Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

Kaleva

(36,264 posts) Tue May 3, 2016, 09:22 PM May 2016

5

Sanders fell far short of what he needed in Indiana.

Winning somewhere around 100% of the vote in California is a must for him to have any chance of getting the nomination.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders fell far short of what he needed in Indiana. (Original Post) Kaleva May 2016 OP

He needed to sweep it! Her Sister May 2016 #1

He is not going to sweep. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #2

He'll get no delegate help from this win. He gets bragging rights, but Trump stepped on his MADem May 2016 #3

He might get 6-7 delegates out of it. apcalc May 2016 #4

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)

1. He needed to sweep it!

Reply to Kaleva (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 09:24 PM

May 2016

Think will be a difference of 1-3 delegates.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)

2. He is not going to sweep.

Reply to Kaleva (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 09:26 PM

May 2016

But I will only discuss that here.

I have checked out of the pit of despair in GD-P.

MADem

(135,425 posts)

3. He'll get no delegate help from this win. He gets bragging rights, but Trump stepped on his

Reply to Kaleva (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 09:28 PM

May 2016

win anyway.

It's going to be Trump v. Clinton. Everyone knows this already. Math does not lie.

apcalc

(4,463 posts)

4. He might get 6-7 delegates out of it.

Reply to Kaleva (Original post)

Tue May 3, 2016, 09:29 PM

May 2016

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Sanders fell far short of...