Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumJust a thought. What if Hillary declines to debate the Trumpster?
Suppose for a minute that she has a good lead at the end of the summer. Why debate that fool?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)TwilightZone
(25,454 posts)Unlike the primaries, there's little indication of the final result until election day - and sometimes later.
Also, there are indications that up to one-quarter of voters or so don't decide until the last few days to a week.
She'll debate him any opportunity she gets. She'll chew him up and spit him out.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)She will meet him toe to toe.
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)unnecessarily.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)handlers would be enormously relieved. There is ZERO chance she would refuse. Lol. on the contrary, she will do all she can to push him into a situation where he can't refuse to serve himself up.
Cha
(297,062 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)madamesilverspurs
(15,800 posts)Even he knows the difference between a real debate and whatever that thing was that he did with 16 other people. Her debating skill would trump his showboating (pun intended).
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)I expect him to be down significantly in the polls.
JustAnotherGen
(31,798 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)he is unworthy to stand on a stage next to any serious Presidential candidate.
Cha
(297,062 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)In this era you would owe your opponent at least 2 debates.
In 1984, Reagan was well ahead of Mondale, and he agreed to debate him twice.
In 1996, Bill Clinton was well ahead of Bob Dole and he agreed to debate him twice.
The precedent has been set. If she declined to debate him the media would hack away at it every single day and her poll numbers would drop.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)That's the format where you take audience questions (albeit staged & pre-screened), walk around, and interact like a human being. Trump isn't going to have his A-shirt, trucker-cap regulars to fall back on with hoots and hollers of approval for every "make America great again" platitude.
It'll be a spectacle for the ages.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)jmowreader
(50,550 posts)She can't wait for the day she can tear Trump apart to his face.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)It's become a tradition and the unwillingness to do so looks terrible.
Blue Idaho
(5,045 posts)especially in today's non-debate debate formats. Today's debates are more about creating "gotcha" monents and zingers rather than highlighting meaningful differences. Add to that - debating isn't even in the skill set for the office of the President and you have an event that has lost all relevance.
I would rather see each candidate face a panel of journalists much like they have to do to get a newspapers endorsement. No preview of questions to be asked, no question off limits, and tough follow up questions. Add some questions submitted online and I think you could have a format that could be really informative.
Today's presidential debates aren't really serving the electorate very well.
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)she could very well have a comfortable lead in the polls. If that is the case, she should consider not having debates.
JustAnotherGen
(31,798 posts)He is not fit to drink her dirty bath water!
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)And bring them over if they aren't already.
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,333 posts)Because he is an orange chicken.
Koinos
(2,792 posts)The cowardly playground bully meets the seasoned prizefighter.
He won't last one round before shrinking to a whimpering pool of pus.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)of debates with .Hillary.