HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » Andrea Mitchell on Rachel...

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:24 PM

Andrea Mitchell on Rachel Maddow

Mitchell is whining about the AP and NBC News declaring Hillary the presumptive nominee because it will confirm for Sanders and Sanders fans who think the system is rigged. I wish she would just go away.

22 replies, 2722 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply Andrea Mitchell on Rachel Maddow (Original post)
SharonClark Jun 2016 OP
realmirage Jun 2016 #1
teamster633 Jun 2016 #2
Her Sister Jun 2016 #3
spooky3 Jun 2016 #4
LoveMyCali Jun 2016 #7
skylucy Jun 2016 #5
otohara Jun 2016 #6
SharonClark Jun 2016 #9
otohara Jun 2016 #13
skylucy Jun 2016 #16
otohara Jun 2016 #20
skylucy Jun 2016 #22
Princess Turandot Jun 2016 #17
sister_rosa_refried Jun 2016 #8
William769 Jun 2016 #10
DawgHouse Jun 2016 #11
skylucy Jun 2016 #12
skylucy Jun 2016 #14
William769 Jun 2016 #15
skylucy Jun 2016 #18
skylucy Jun 2016 #19
Cha Jun 2016 #21

Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:25 PM

1. She's been a hater for years. She's one of their worst

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:26 PM

2. I'm sure it's only because Mrs. Greenspan had hoped to vote for Bernie in the GE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:26 PM

3. So the news is AP

 

Newspeople making themselves the news!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:30 PM

4. And, note to BS staffer: polls are less important than votes! The Dem

Voters have spoken and will speak tomorrow and next Tuesday.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spooky3 (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:31 PM

7. He's getting on my last nerve

I tuned in because I knew Hillary was interviewed today not to hear this sniveling weasel.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:31 PM

5. Yes! I just heard her doing Bernie's whining FOR HIM. She is sickening.

And she also is full of it. What she was saying didn't even make any sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:31 PM

6. Well?

 

In Bernie world this just confirms their distrust - hatred of DNC, media.

This is not good, not at all.

Quit trashing Andrea Mitchell - she's just the messenger.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:33 PM

9. Yes, she is a messenger for Sanders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:39 PM

13. Why On Earth Would Andrea Mitchell

 

be a messenger for Sanders?

Jesus have you all forgotten who she's married to?
Who on MSNBC is the messenger for Hillary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:42 PM

16. Well, no. After she reported the news (no prob with that) she went on and on

about how that makes Bernies case that "the system is rigged". How does that even make sense?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skylucy (Reply #16)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:50 PM

20. On And On? OMG Can We Not Handle

 

Andrea Mitchell stating the fucking obvious?

The Sanders are not happy, neither is Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #20)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:15 PM

22. I agree with you on that. And the funny thing is that I don't think the pundits are

very happy either. What are they going to talk about all day tomorrow? Kind of spoils the "suspense " that the networks build up to ramp up the ratings. I think you misunderstood what we were dissing Mitchell about. She reported the news because she was told to by NBC. That wasn't what annoyed us. It was her "commentary" after that that annoyed us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:43 PM

17. And in 24 hours, he would be acknowledging that she won?

I don't think that his reaction to the news would be any different tomorrow.

My guess is that the statement he released tonight - that Super Ds don't count until the convention - was already prepared for release tomorrow evening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)


Response to sister_rosa_refried (Reply #8)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:35 PM

10. Please don't use that type of language in this Group.

Thank you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sister_rosa_refried (Reply #8)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:36 PM

11. Not cool. Please consider deleting this comment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sister_rosa_refried (Reply #8)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:39 PM

12. I haven't heard that word since I was in the 6th grade...Isn't that a

word for a guy---Or can it be used for women too? Andrea Mitchell is definitely one though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skylucy (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:40 PM

14. Uh Oh. Is is that bad of a word? See...Some of us have led

sheltered lives and don't even know what it means.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to skylucy (Reply #14)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:41 PM

15. Google is your friend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #15)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:44 PM

18. OK. Will I lose my innocence if I google it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William769 (Reply #15)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:50 PM

19. Well---Never too old to learn something new. Interesting though that there were two definitions.

One was the nasty one but the other was "An obnoxious person". Hmmmm. Oh well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SharonClark (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:02 PM

21. The Media IS Rigged, Andrea and you know.. quit trying to Deflect.. you're doing it poorly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread