Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumIf the DNC used the GOP method it would be Clinton: 3,030 -- Sanders: 967
Where winner takes all.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 885 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the DNC used the GOP method it would be Clinton: 3,030 -- Sanders: 967 (Original Post)
LiberalFighter
Jun 2016
OP
538-Nate (Silver) calculated an electoral map using the Dem primary results..
Princess Turandot
Jun 2016
#4
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)1. wow!
and yeap!
Our way was very good to Sanders!
still_one
(92,153 posts)2. Exactly. Winner take all
teamster633
(2,029 posts)3. She was the overwhelming choice of the people.
Despite the protests of all the whiners.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)4. 538-Nate (Silver) calculated an electoral map using the Dem primary results..
i.e. Hill's vs Sanders' winning states. It came out 399 to 139. (These data guys seem to do strange things for fun.)
You can see the map here:
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/740415945525604352