We Need to Reckon With the Story What Happened Tells

[ehrnst]

Hillary Clinton has a unique perspective on a world-historical event. Why shouldn’t she write a book about it?

Hillary Clinton can’t catch a break. “Flawed” is attached to her name like a Homeric epithet. Never mind that she won almost 3 million more votes than Donald Trump: She lost in three swing states by 80,000, proof that she’s a horrible person who ran the worst campaign ever. But what could you expect? She’s a bitch and a cunt (men), or can’t-put-my-finger-on-it-but-just-not-likable (women). She’s got a shrill voice and thinks she’s oh-so-special. She voted for the war in Iraq—true, so did John Kerry and Joe Biden and that momentary darling of the left, John Edwards, but her vote was just… different. She supported the 1994 crime bill, which Bernie Sanders voted for, but that was different too. She gave those speeches to Goldman Sachs. She’s too feminist, or not feminist enough, too liberal, too conservative, too tame, too outspoken, too known a quantity—but also, who is she really? And she’s too privileged—not at all like Kerry, who married into millions, or, for that matter, FDR. She was too hawkish for the left but too female to be commander in chief for the right—and why did she want to be president anyway, a question asked of no man ever but which she faced a thousand times. Whatevs! Lock her up—if not in prison, in a retirement home. Because have I mentioned that she is old? Just Google “creepy grandma grin.”

.....................................

Obviously, she should don sackcloth and ashes and crawl into the forest to die. But no, she dares to say that others had a part in the way the election went: Bernie Sanders, the media, James Comey, Russia, fake news. CNN’s Dylan Byers is bothered by that, tweeting: “The Hillary Clinton ‘I-take-full-responsibility-but-here-are-all-the-other-reasons-I-lost’ tour continues to be intrinsically problematic.” I don’t see why. All major events have multiple causes. The left focuses on her rather mild jabs at Sanders, but her other critiques are far more serious—and dead-on, too. The media was at its worst: There was endless coverage of the e-mail non-scandal (Chris Cillizza alone wrote at least 50 columns!) and almost none of her actual positions. While both candidates received largely negative coverage, a curiously neglected Harvard study shows that Trump’s platform got more attention than his scandals, while for Hillary it was the reverse. Comey’s interventions—especially his letter to Congress, just 11 days before the election, stating that he was reopening his investigation into whether she had mishandled classified documents—were disastrous. Without that announcement, Nate Silver strongly suggests, Clinton would have won. (I just hope I live long enough to learn why Comey kept quiet about the FBI’s investigation of Trump’s Russia ties.) The steady drip of hacked e-mails from the Democratic National Committee and the campaign itself, the dissemination of false stories on Facebook through Russian bots and trolls—what Obama called “this dust cloud of nonsense”—it adds up. An RT video called “How 100% of the Clintons’ 2015 ‘charity’ went to…themselves” was viewed 10 million times.

So what happened? As she acknowledges, Hillary—the policy wonk, Girl Scout, and “lifelong fan of school supplies”—never quite grasped what she was up against until it was too late. She is constantly being surprised: that Trump is a grotesque and ignorant bully, that people are as angry and irrational and sexist as they are, that the media isn’t more interested in her carefully considered, achievable policies on every social problem under the sun, that truth doesn’t matter. She took too much pride in refusing to promise everyone “a pony,” whether it was Bernie’s proposal for single-payer health insurance and free public college (not ponies in my view) or Trump’s promise to resurrect coal mines and factories. That let Bernie and Trump, from different angles, put her in the position of being Mean Mom to their Fun Dad. Mean Mom, of course, is the one who makes sure that the vegetables are eaten, the homework gets done, and the bills are paid on time, while Fun Dad makes the kids feel they have power and life is exciting. In the end, Mom got more votes, but Dad—both dads—got more love.

We’ll be paying for that for a long, long time.

https://www.thenation.com/article/we-need-to-reckon-with-the-story-what-happened-tells/

[JHan]

1. It's one of the realest political memoirs I've ever read.

vastly superior to the usual fare and compelling to read.

It's also Hillary's best book.

I also couldn't help thinking .. as I read it.. that perhaps the real crime since the election has been the way some thousands of voters in three states have come to define all of America.

If Hillary got those couple thousand votes, the media would be falling over itself to explain how despite all odds she managed to connect to the white working class. If Hillary got those couple thousand votes, we would be told that the racial resentments, xenophobic rhetoric, and sexism her opponent indulged in are electoral poison.

Instead, this constituency of voters - barely enough to fill a large stadium - are used to speak for America and much is projected on to them and their choices.

Hillary's book shows how close we came to avoiding the current catastrophe in the White House -and some vested interests don't want that lesson learned.

EDIT: And the more she's told to shut up, the more her detractors prove the point of her book.

[ehrnst]

2. If she had gotten those votes

She would have been flamed by Brogressives for not winning by a landslide, and that the Democratic Party "failed."

You know they would have been criticizing every single cabinet nominee that Bernie didn't personally approve of, as "corporatist!" and talking about primarying her from day one. And they would have been whining that "there are all these investigations now, and that means she can't be as effective as who we wanted! He would have been respected, and there would have been NOTHING that they would have hung over his head!"

Except there would have.

[JHan]

3. true.

They already started on it when they heard who the head of her transition team would have been .

I have zero patience for them and the way they undermine with their bullshit.