This message was self-deleted by its author

[misterhighwasted]

This message was self-deleted by its author (misterhighwasted) on Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:05 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[Agschmid]

1. No one is going to get prosecuted for that war.

No matter who is elected president.

Unfortunately it just isn't going to happen.

[BlueCaliDem]

2. That may or may not be the case, but the Bush family name will be damaged forever,

and the American people will finally begin to understand that putting a Republican in the White House - whether through not voting or voting for Republicans - is a very bad idea for the United States' national security and if people really don't want anymore wars of choice.

That's my take on it.

[notadmblnd]

4. Oh please.... If the assination of JFK, the Iran Contra scandal, the Savings and loan Scandal

The doing business with the enemy during WWII scandal and a plethora of other scandals hasn't damaged the bush name- this isn't. If you were here back when it was all happening- it was common knowledge we were being lied into a war and we all knew it was being done with the assistance of the Brits.

If anything, Hillary was going to use the dirt to get the right to cooperate when/if she gains the White House.

[notadmblnd]

11. but that's on republicans not bush.

nt

[BlueCaliDem]

13. It's on BOTH, actually. eom

[notadmblnd]

16. Nah, no scandal will ever hurt them.

they have enough money and power to insulate them from anything.


When I say hurt, I mean that they will never pay for any of their crimes. Not gaining political office will not hurt them. They don't really care, they have enough money and dirt on others that they can buy or blackmail others into doing their bidding.

[BlueCaliDem]

12. Those incidents were *before* the advent of the interwebs. Now, information is widely available

on blogs and in articles that never make it to the front pages of print media, therefore, they were never able to reach the masses. With the internet, rumors can travel and reach billions lightning quick.

It doesn't take lawsuits and perp-walks to soil a family name. All it takes is innuendo and the appearance of corruption.

But I agree, and condone, that she just might use this information in order to bring those Teapublicans in the House to heel when she wins the White House and Democrats when back the Senate, and when she wants to get things done for the American people.

[notadmblnd]

14. I'll just say that I disagree about hurting the bush name

[BlueCaliDem]

15. Then we'll agree to disagree about that.

[Thinkingabout]

22. In 2006 the Democrats regained the house the Democrats made a decision not to investigate but get on

With handling other business, ergo, no investigation.

[BlueCaliDem]

3. Do you have a link? eom

[BlueCaliDem]

9. Thanks so much, mhw! I hadn't seen it on DU yesterday

so I'd love to read the article.

[yallerdawg]

6. Wouldn't this be great?

You know what they say:

"Payback is a...pair of pissed-off Clintons who plotted to win an election and take down a Party!"

Perfection!

[Iliyah]

20. fake news along with corporate media is already starting to

shift blame of 9/11 to President Clinton. Will it fly, I don't think so, but an effective mo of the GOP is denial denial denial.

W's legacy is tarnished along with his administration.