Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 03:43 AM Dec 2015

Wall Street is Clinton's achilles heel and for Sanders's sake it will stay that way

Interesting read from The Guardian. I am posting it here to avoid the snipers it will undoubtedly attract in GDP that will distract from its main points.

http://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2015/dec/27/wall-street-hillary-clinton-achilles-heel-bernie-sanders?CMP=fb_gu

From the link:

Setting aside the idea that Wall Street, collectively, is as capable of conspiring effectively as Sanders believes (if it did, I doubt that we would have experienced the 2008 crisis, or that as many institutions or individuals within them would have been caught off guard, or nabbed by regulators for doing stuff that they shouldn’t), I’m not convinced that Clinton is the patsy that Sanders would like us to imagine her as being.
...
It’s true that Clinton’s reform plan for Wall Street isn’t as dramatic as that proposed by Sanders. She wants to keep the Dodd-Frank Act in place and keep funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at robust enough levels to ensure the organization is effective in fulfilling its mandate. Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, who oversaw the creation of the CFPB and who has been an outspoken critic of Wall Street, hailed this and some other aspects of Clinton’s plans, even though the two differ on the extent to which Wall Street should be regulated.
...
Clearly, aggressive risk taking by banks was a major cause of the financial crisis. But of the institutions that were most directly responsible for triggering the 2008 crisis – Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, Lehman Brothers, AIG, Fannie Mae – none was a big bank created by the repeal of Glass-Steagall. They were traditional investment banks, savings and loan institutions, insurance companies and a government-backed housing finance entity.
,,,
But it’s far from certain that simply restoring Glass-Steagall would be a panacea, or that failing to do so suggests that Clinton is in the bankers’ pockets. Indeed, Clinton’s plan has the virtue of stretching beyond the banks, and recognizing that real financial power on Wall Street often resides elsewhere: in the hands of hedge funds, private equity funds, offshore institutions, high-speed traders, and other kinds of trading platforms. The banks may be big and powerful, but they are the employees of these shadow institutions and individuals – folks like hedge fund manager John Paulson, whose firm made $15bn and who personally made $4bn (or $10m a day) shorting mortgage securities during the financial crisis. Clinton’s suggestions for regulating Wall Street call for more oversight of this “shadow” world.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street is Clinton's achilles heel and for Sanders's sake it will stay that way (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 OP
Thank you, BlueMTex! Hillary is detailed oriented and focused on ways to actually solve Cha Dec 2015 #1
Exactly - the problem itself BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #2
I think you mean reinstating Glass-Steagall, but yes, that is no panacea. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #3
LOL! Good catch, SS! BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #4
Real solutions to complex problems do not upaloopa Dec 2015 #5
We know Glass Stegall would not have prevented the finanical crisis and also know the Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #6

Cha

(296,778 posts)
1. Thank you, BlueMTex! Hillary is detailed oriented and focused on ways to actually solve
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 03:49 AM
Dec 2015

the problems.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
2. Exactly - the problem itself
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 03:52 AM
Dec 2015

is complex and just using a simple meme like "Repeal Glass-Steagal" - attractive as that may sound, if it even is possible - doesn't get to the heart of it.

SunSeeker

(51,504 posts)
3. I think you mean reinstating Glass-Steagall, but yes, that is no panacea.
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 05:02 AM
Dec 2015

We are faced with a complex problem that reaches far outside the big banks. Only Hillary seems to get that and has a plan to deal with it.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. Real solutions to complex problems do not
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 08:47 AM
Dec 2015

fit into a talking point campaign like Bernie has. Also his cohorts are so full of hatred toward anyone with more than they have that they aren't capable of understanding complex ideas. Just "break up the big banks" and "bring back Glass Steagal" are the limits of their thinking.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
6. We know Glass Stegall would not have prevented the finanical crisis and also know the
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:32 PM
Dec 2015

CFMA played into the financial crisis and Sanders voted for this bill which was veto proof and Bill Clinton signed the bill. Hillary also wants to invoke the Volcker rule which will break up the banks which fails and this is another of Sanders issues. I am surprised once Hillary said she wanted to invoke the Volcker rule which would break up the banks, probably he will take this stand soon.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Wall Street is Clinton's ...