Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumMost Of The “Most Valuable Progressives” Named By ‘The Nation’ Have Endorsed…Hillary?
If like me youre a longtime and faithful reader of The Nation a venerable publication celebrating its 150th anniversary then you probably saw its recent cover editorial endorsing Bernie Sanders for president. That lengthy essay, along with many other Nation articles over the past several months, leaves the unmistakable impression that Sanders is the only truly progressive choice for Democratic voters.
Yet just a month ago, The Nation published its 2015 Progressive Honor Roll, an annual feature written by John Nichols, who happens to be a highly enthusiastic Sanders supporter which named several strong supporters of Hillary Clinton among Americas most valuable progressives. In fact, of the individuals named on Nichols list, nearly every single one is backing Clinton (one exception is Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell, most valuable Cabinet member, who must observe administration neutrality in the primary but as a former top Clinton administration official would very likely endorse her).
http://www.nationalmemo.com/most-of-the-most-valuable-progressives-named-by-the-nation-have-endorsed-hillary/
Yet just a month ago, The Nation published its 2015 Progressive Honor Roll, an annual feature written by John Nichols, who happens to be a highly enthusiastic Sanders supporter which named several strong supporters of Hillary Clinton among Americas most valuable progressives. In fact, of the individuals named on Nichols list, nearly every single one is backing Clinton (one exception is Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell, most valuable Cabinet member, who must observe administration neutrality in the primary but as a former top Clinton administration official would very likely endorse her).
http://www.nationalmemo.com/most-of-the-most-valuable-progressives-named-by-the-nation-have-endorsed-hillary/
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most Of The “Most Valuable Progressives” Named By ‘The Nation’ Have Endorsed…Hillary? (Original Post)
72DejaVu
Jan 2016
OP
Yep. And the ONLY candidate running on our side who can actually put 'meat' behind her
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2016
#14
Hekate
(100,133 posts)1. My my my. Fancy that.
DURHAM D
(32,986 posts)2. oops
Cha
(317,698 posts)3. Wow, Great find, DejaVu!

Thank you!
Most Of The Most Valuable Progressives Named By The Nation Have Endorsed Hillary?
http://www.nationalmemo.com/most-of-the-most-valuable-progressives-named-by-the-nation-have-endorsed-hillary/
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)5. Ikr?
FrenchieCat
(68,868 posts)6. Guess they want to win....
and not give the GOP a Trifecta!
Make sense.
I feel the same way!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)7. Probably know Hillary is the most qualified candidate running.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)14. Yep. And the ONLY candidate running on our side who can actually put 'meat' behind her
policies and get those through. She knows how to navigate the pitfalls and procedural filibustering that Republicans are bound to use if they don't get one of their macho-men into the White House.
What I love about Hillary Clinton is, she takes no prisoners. She's a fighter and she's fearless, and that's what we need in order to strengthen and expand the good work President Obama has been able to get through.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)15. yes, a very good post
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)16. Thanks, Thinkingabout! :-) eom
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)8. K & R
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)9. They're either scared of the Clintons or they're oligarchs
Because no one would support Hillary because she's the best candidate out there; they have to be coerced
brer cat
(27,439 posts)10. Bought by Goldman Sachs
no doubt.
for the alert-happy.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)11. Well, of course they have. Who else would "Democrats" endorse?
brer cat
(27,439 posts)12. Interesting find. k&r
Kath1
(4,309 posts)17. I love The Nation!
A little shocked, but glad they endorse Hillary!

