Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumLeftofcool ... stay strong! We love you! See you soon! xo xo xo xo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110756611
Beaverhausen
(24,701 posts)Seriously it was funny. This is beyond ridiculous.
Cha
(319,494 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and soon.
still_one
(98,883 posts)That is what you call a double standard
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)know what you mean, lunamagica~
leftofcool!
Jackie~
UtahLib
(3,182 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)Loki
(3,830 posts)I don't give a rat's ass what those juveniles think. Go Leftofcool!
all american girl
(1,788 posts)Oh Yeah I did and commented on it. This has been silly and wrong. I'm starting to notice a trend....
Codeine
(25,586 posts)that's Freeper-level sexism and surviving BernieJuries 6-1.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)who voted for Hillary....makes my husband dumb and informed also....without the girly bits...who knew? I laugh at these people.
GusBob
(8,268 posts)Of course I am not gonna post what I really think, even though its true.
Note to jury: There is some assembly required for this post.
stonecutter357
(13,051 posts)johnp3907
(4,316 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)And Skinner needs to address them.
johnp3907
(4,316 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)Oh my god
brer cat
(27,617 posts)that we can rec hidden threads. Done!
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)BillyDawg
(82 posts)Fight on!!
shenmue
(38,598 posts)mcar
(46,166 posts)What nonsense!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)mcar
(46,166 posts)It should have been handled months ago IMO. But we will move forward.
still_one
(98,883 posts)moderators that make ruling on specific TOS criteria would go a long way to weeding out alert stalking and bias
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... having human moderators to keep an eye on the jury results could be a good start. (Even if it was just regular "spot-checking"... kinda like random drug testing for law enforcement jobs. It won't catch everyone, but it will discourage abuse and perhaps eliminate the obvious repeat offenders.)
Having alerts be NOT anonymous would probably help. Having longer time-outs when a jury votes 7-0 against hiding would also help. Perhaps having daily limits would prevent stalking-type behavior. Maybe 6-1 or 5-2 results would be the break-point for a 24 hour waiting period. Automatic review for 4-3 "close calls" of hidden posts would be a positive change.
Of course, all of these suggestions would require additional programming and testing of the code. Code doesn't just write itself... so it's likely to be at least a year before anything meaningful happens.
still_one
(98,883 posts)There has to be a specific set of guide lines.
Alerting just because someone disagrees with a post is too ambiguous
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)goddammit.
JohnnyLib2
(11,337 posts)Leftofcool, they dun ya wrong.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and relying on their numerical superiority to shut down every Clinton supporter. I cannot fucking believe how shitty this place has become in the face of such nonsense.
Starry Messenger
(32,382 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I suspect they try to get most of us... quite often and only rarely hear about it when it skates by.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)obamanut2012
(29,412 posts)jsmirman
(4,507 posts)no one can possibly be this delicate for real, right?
Gothmog
(180,582 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)me too
DemonGoddess
(5,127 posts)that is a funny, funny topic! Love the responses.
Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)I guess they've moved on from "denial" to to "anger." I wonder what's in store for "bargaining"?