Hillary Clinton

Hillary4Prez2016

(33 posts) Sun Feb 28, 2016, 09:20 PM Feb 2016

538 Update on Massachusetts Prediction....

Polls-Plus: 88% chance of winning
Polls-Only: 85% chance of winning

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

538 Update on Massachusetts Prediction.... (Original Post) Hillary4Prez2016 Feb 2016 OP

K & R Iliyah Feb 2016 #1

Thanks mainstreetonce Feb 2016 #2

Thanks, more work to do. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #3

Yesterday's (2/27) numbers were.. Princess Turandot Feb 2016 #4

K&R. nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #5

Wow! question everything Feb 2016 #6

I wouldn't say Hillary4Prez2016 Feb 2016 #7

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

1. K & R

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 09:21 PM

Feb 2016

mainstreetonce

(4,178 posts)

2. Thanks

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 09:22 PM

Feb 2016

Hill yes!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

3. Thanks, more work to do.

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 09:30 PM

Feb 2016

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)

4. Yesterday's (2/27) numbers were..

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 09:44 PM

Feb 2016

Polls-Plus: 82%
Polls-Only: 63%

UtahLib

(3,179 posts)

5. K&R. nt

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:50 PM

Feb 2016

question everything

(47,434 posts)

6. Wow!

Reply to Hillary4Prez2016 (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:58 PM

Feb 2016

I do remember MA from 2008. She won it handily, even though both senators - Kennedy and Kerry - were strong supporters of Obama.

I don't know that in this cycle we have other states where the elected officials stand in contrast to the voters. Minnesota may be one. It is expected to go Sanders, while both senators: Klobuchar and Franken support Hillary.

Hillary4Prez2016

(33 posts)

7. I wouldn't say

Reply to question everything (Reply #6)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 11:00 PM

Feb 2016

Minnesota is expected to go to Sanders. He has a good chance there for sure, but it's a toss up as far as we know.

Reply to this discussion