HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » I think the reason for De...

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:36 PM

 

I think the reason for Democrats low turnout

is that lots don't care who wins the nomination and just are waiting for the people who do care to choose the nominee.

They know they will vote Democrat and they like both candidates and they just don't want to put the time and effort on the primary. But will let us, the bunch who cares battle it out. Come November they will come to vote for the Democrat we choose. Especially with the roster that the Republicans have chosen.

15 replies, 1879 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply I think the reason for Democrats low turnout (Original post)
Her Sister Mar 2016 OP
Bigredhunk Mar 2016 #1
anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #2
Tarheel_Dem Mar 2016 #3
Downwinder Mar 2016 #4
yallerdawg Mar 2016 #5
Tommy2Tone Mar 2016 #6
Her Sister Mar 2016 #7
SunSeeker Mar 2016 #9
LannyDeVaney Mar 2016 #10
ismnotwasm Mar 2016 #15
fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #8
Her Sister Mar 2016 #11
fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #13
jmowreader Mar 2016 #12
ismnotwasm Mar 2016 #14

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:41 PM

1. I'm Not Sure What It Is

I have a feeling (and hope to hell) that voters will be a lot more enthused when Trump and his followers are out there doing all their crazy shit.

As far as high republican turnout, it's not surprising. It's been posted before how hard it is to keep the WH for longer than 8 (and 12) years. President Obama has done a much better job that the previous guy. Remember how motivated we were after 8 years of the previous guy? r's think President Obama has been a disaster, b/c that's what they hear in their bubble. They're as motivated now as we were in '08 (well, not QUITE as motivated, but motivated nonetheless).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:45 PM

2. From the people I know (large East Coast college)...

 

The die-hard Bernie peeps are very excited, so they will vote for sure. But in my dorm, for example, only about 10% of them are really the cheerleaders of the group. The rest go along because it seems to be the thing to do. Those kids will vote if it's convenient and nothing else better comes up that day. The Hillary group (which is growing with her recent victories) by and large thinks that she is a shoe-in and don't think it's that important to vote in the primary. Hopefully the show on the other side will start to motivate people!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:46 PM

3. I think you may be right. My father (God rest his soul) didn't bother with primaries, but as a....

Democrat, he always voted for the eventual nominee. I guess that me & my siblings got our passion for political involvement from my Mom's family. They were intimately involved in local politics, and would never miss an election, not even for dog catcher.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:48 PM

4. Maybe they died and were not replaced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:30 PM

5. Lots don't care who.

They will turn out in November.

So far, for the Bernie people, no 'revolutionary' numbers to speak of, some success intimidating others at the caucus states - damn sure didn't work on Hillary's friend Elizabeth Warren!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:15 PM

6. I could not disagree more.

I think a low turnout probably means most Dems think Hillary is the nominee and see no reason to vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #6)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:25 PM

7. Democrats like HRC more than you are insinuating

 

and most despise the idea of any of the Republican circus show.

Thanks for playing!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #6)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:13 PM

9. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #6)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:20 PM

10. "No reason to vote" Very sad.

 

You always have a reason to vote.

Sec. Clinton got more total votes than any other candidate in any party yesterday.

I don't think the Clinton supporters turnout is the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LannyDeVaney (Reply #10)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:38 PM

15. Which is an interesting observation

Given the nature of the proposed Sanders "revolution"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 07:09 PM

8. "Low" turnout compared to what and when? eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Her Sister (Reply #11)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:42 PM

13. Most of those states are dominated by R's.

Seems to make sense that more R's voted than D's. One thing of interest to me is how the votes for the NOT Donald are pretty much split between the Canadian and numb-nuts. McDonald has torn the republicon party apart, even though all 3 are nutters. Could be a big possibility that Hillary will glean a lot of R votes come the big one.

I'd love to see a 50 / 0 rout.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 08:23 PM

12. I KNOW the reason for our low turnout is twofold

First, primary elections only draw serious political aficionados. The casual voter very rarely goes to a primary or caucus.

And second, we have two candidates on the ballot who will probably, once in office, govern about the same way. Congress isn't going to raise a bunch of taxes. They aren't going to dismantle Obamacare and replace it with a single-payer health plan that costs more than the entire current federal budget, or expand the government enough to manage that kind of program. They aren't going to sign off on a Free Tuition for All program. And they're not going to kill half the small businesses in America by doubling the minimum wage. The reason they won't do any of the things Bernie wants in the way Bernie wants them done, is the voters would shitcan them at the next election if they even thought about giving Bernie what he wants. Remember kids, a congresscritter's first concern is his or her seat. The Hillary plan can be enacted without causing a wholesale replacement of the entire Congress and immediate repeal of the whole schmear. So...our choice is have the Hillary plan enacted by a friendly grandmother, or the Hillary plan enacted by a perpetually-pissed-off old man.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:37 PM

14. You have a point

This is my first primary where I really really care, and it's been an interesting experiance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread