HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » Adjusting the goals for N...

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:11 AM

Adjusting the goals for NY

Remember how they were telling us they'll win it, and turn it around? Primary 2.0? According to this story http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernie-and-hillary-prep-for-new-york-clash-221321 thet are now striving for a "credibility threshhold"
Sanders’ allies said the goal for the primary is to eat into Clinton’s delegate take by winning at least 40 percent of the vote -- a percentage they cite as a “credibility threshold.”

I guess those very expensive pollsters finally came in with their reports

13 replies, 2184 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
Reply Adjusting the goals for NY (Original post)
robbedvoter Mar 2016 OP
liberal N proud Mar 2016 #1
Treant Mar 2016 #6
72DejaVu Mar 2016 #7
robbedvoter Mar 2016 #11
stopbush Mar 2016 #2
robbedvoter Mar 2016 #3
Trenzalore Mar 2016 #4
CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #13
beachbumbob Mar 2016 #5
jmowreader Mar 2016 #10
SaschaHM Mar 2016 #8
DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #9
CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #12

Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:14 AM

1. Lowering expectations?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:19 PM

6. Lowered Expectations, indeed...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:22 PM

7. Pretty bad

When the expectation is that you are going to get your ass handed to you, and you figure it would be wise to LOWER expectations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:13 PM

11. Deleted

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:28 AM

2. And if they get 30%, it will also be credible

As 30 is close to 35 and 35 is close to 40.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stopbush (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:35 AM

3. because after all one can transcend math

Or so Tad Devine tells me and he ought to know, because that's why they pay him the big bucks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:37 AM

4. They gotta find a way to keep the donations going

Tad wants to retire in June

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trenzalore (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:26 PM

13. To Grand Cayman, Cayman Brac, or Little Cayman? Decisions, decisions, eh Tad? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:05 PM

5. Not gaining delegates on Hillary is not eating into her delegate lead

 

So that sentence really doesn't make much sense about winning at least 40% of the vote...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beachbumbob (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:59 PM

10. No! No! You don't understand!

They can't tell Bernie how bad he's really going to do in New York for fear he fires his entire team and replaces them with...oh, I don't know, Bob Shrum is still available...before Sorta-Super Tuesday rolls around. And they can't tell Bernie's supporters he's going to blow New York by epic proportions because they'll start spending those $23 donations at DraftKings or on milk for the baby. Hence, the Credibility Threshold. "Yeah, we're gonna fuckin' lose, but if we can hit forty percent of the popular vote we'll limit her gain on the day to only fifty delegates instead of 150!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:26 PM

8. I guess they decided...

to go full RW and Marco Rubio their way to the nomination. I doubt it will work out any better for them than it did for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:39 PM

9. K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to robbedvoter (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:24 PM

12. I noticed that too and lulz'd. Back in 2008, they called this the Kitchen Sink phase, right? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread