Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:50 AM

BS: Taking attention away from NYDN INTERVIEW FIASCO

BS and co. are using these tactics to obfuscate the conversation away from the interview ramifications and conclusions. They know this interview could prove fatal.

They are doing damage control by going on the offensive and trying to do damage to HRC and trying to put her in the defensive.

Also they learnt from Trump how to get free publicity. NY is expensive! This way they are on the news w/o having to cough up the money. See BS in the news today!!! They overspent in Wisconsin.

BS and co. figured it is OK to lie about HRC. It is just HRC! Everyone lies about her and it becomes the new truth.

BS once again is the arbiter of purity, the higher ground and now whether someone is qualified or not. Plus HRC is a woman so harder to be qualified.

Taking attention away from: The math, Nevada fiasco, MIA full taxes. FEC letters about 10million mystery money, NYDN editorial interview fiasco. Anything else?

READY FOR OVER QUALIFIED HRC!!!!

8 replies, 488 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
BS: Taking attention away from NYDN INTERVIEW FIASCO (Original post)	Her Sister	Apr 2016	OP
+1	Buzz Clik	Apr 2016	#1
How about Sandy Hook?	KewlKat	Apr 2016	#2
That is what it is designed for. He still is sticking to his lie.	Jitter65	Apr 2016	#3
Of course they are.. that's their MO.. they're Always the Victim.. Wah! I hope the NYDN	Cha	Apr 2016	#4
Yes add more!	Her Sister	Apr 2016	#5
Let's be honest, if Clinton wanted to retaliate, she could do the same and drop something	KittyWampus	Apr 2016	#6
I think she should focus on the issues and on his	spooky3	Apr 2016	#7
Think we can't let him and his campaign control the conversation	Her Sister	Apr 2016	#8

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:51 AM

Buzz Clik (38,437 posts)

1. +1

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:52 AM

KewlKat (5,326 posts)

2. How about Sandy Hook?

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:54 AM

Jitter65 (3,089 posts)

3. That is what it is designed for. He still is sticking to his lie.

Shameful!

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:55 AM

Cha (282,218 posts)

4. Of course they are.. that's their MO.. they're Always the Victim.. Wah! I hope the NYDN

doesn't let the country forget it.

Stealing Hillary's Data.. they're the Victims

bernie

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:57 AM

Her Sister (6,444 posts)

5. Yes add more!

Plus not helping the DEMocrats down the ballot. "We will see"

saying "will turn Superdelegates" to him.

Everything his surrogates say.

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:59 AM

KittyWampus (55,894 posts)

6. Let's be honest, if Clinton wanted to retaliate, she could do the same and drop something

equally nasty but TRUE.

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:03 AM

spooky3 (31,264 posts)

7. I think she should focus on the issues and on his

Lack of practical plans for bringing his vision to reality.

Reply to this post

Response to Her Sister (Original post)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:10 AM

Her Sister (6,444 posts)

8. Think we can't let him and his campaign control the conversation

NYDN interview was bad bad bad!!!! It was almost Marco Rubio bad!! It proved a lot of things.
Bet he isn't going to give any more editorial interviews!!

Reply to this post

Hillary Clinton (Group)