Dispatches: Argentina’s Supreme Court Appointments

[Judi Lynn]

December 18, 2015 |Dispatches

Dispatches: Argentina’s Supreme Court Appointments

On Monday, Argentina’s President Mauricio Macri filled two vacancies on the Supreme Court (one open since January 2015), arguing that missing 40 percent of its members made it difficult for the five-member body to operate. The court – which has in recent years been key in protecting and upholding basic rights in the country – adopts decisions by a majority of its members, so any ruling must have the approval of at least three justices. Without these appointments, the positions would remain open at least until March 2016, when the Senate resumes.

However, the manner of the appointments has stirred controversy in Argentina. Although there is a general consensus that both candidates – Carlos Rosenkrantz, both an academic and a practitioner, and Horacio Rosatti, a former justice minister – have the qualifications required for the job, the appointments have not been approved by the Senate, although the constitution requires such approval for permanent Supreme Court appointments. The appointments are only temporary, giving the justices a different security of tenure than their three permanent colleagues. Also, the selection process, which was set out in a previous decree adopted by former President Néstor Kirchner in 2003 and required input from civil society, was not followed.

Macri’s decree, under which the new justices were appointed, cites a constitutional provision that allows the president to “fill employment vacancies that require Senate approval” during a congressional recess, and states that the appointments are only valid until the end of the following legislature – in this case, until the end of 2016. Some jurists publicly questioned whether the appointments were lawfully made under this provision, because they challenge the interpretation of a Supreme Court vacancy as an “employment” one.

The justices are supposed to take office in February, and their appointments could later become permanent if they are eventually ratified by the Senate.

More:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/12/18/dispatches-argentinas-supreme-court-appointments

[forest444]

1. And what accounts for that "40% vacancy" in the Supreme Court?

Senate filibusters by minority parties of former President Cristina Kirchner's Supreme Court nominee Roberto Carlés - a nominee that had received across-the-board support when he was first nominated a year ago.

The second "vacancy" was created by a 97-year old Supreme Court Justice (Carlos Fayt) who was blind as a bat and by all accounts senile - but refused to step down until his fellow right-winger, Mauricio Macri, took office.

Has Mitch McCocaine been giving the Argentine right lessons in congressional obstruction tactics?

[Judi Lynn]

2. Have no doubt at all the evil schemes which have been playing out in our own Congress

through malicious, greedy, racist Republicans have been discussed, maybe even concocted in tandem with similar fascists everywhere, as they give their largest push yet to seize power everywhere, take the world by force, if possible.

It would come as no surprise whatsoever if we learned this has been going on far longer than innocent people might ever have expected.

Funny you mentioned creepy old Mitch McCocaine. I was just thinking about his strange, powerful father-in-laws shipping fleet yesterday. Someday, you'd think they'll have to answer for it.

[Ghost Dog]

3. Thanks. That answers my first question.

This doesn't look good (understatement).