Latin America
Related: About this forumOn Media Bias in Venezuela
Published on Wednesday, October 3, 2012 by The Americas Blog / CEPR
On Media Bias in Venezuela
by Mark Weisbrot
Everywhere you look, there are people who are taking seriously the claim that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has a big media advantage over the opposition in the upcoming elections. The Committee to Protect Journalists, in their latest report (PDF) on Venezuela, states that a vast state media presence echoes the governments positions, and refers to the government as having a media empire.
From the Wilson Centers latest report (PDF), we read: Media coverage is not even moderately balanced. . . . In television, the governments predominance is overwhelming; it was estimated that by 2007 it controlled seven national television channels and 35 open community channels."
These statements are false and misleading, but they are adopted uncritically in almost all mainstream media coverage. In fact, state TV had about 5.9 percent of the audience that watches television in Venezuela in 2009-2010. These data were gathered by AGB Panamericana de Venezuela Medición S.A., a local affiliate of Nielsen Media Research International, and are probably as reliable as Nielsen ratings in the United States. The data were collected through equipment boxes placed in each home, measuring minutes of each channel watched. A representative sample of 1000 households was constructed and data were gathered over ten years.
Thus, the above statements are similar to claiming that PBS TV, the public TV in the U.S., dominates broadcast TV in the United States. Most of the major newspapers (e.g., El Nacional, El Universal) are also strongly against the government. According to CONATEL data, only about 14 percent of radio is publicly owned; and since there is more strongly anti-government radio in Venezuela than TV, the opposition almost certainly has more advantage in radio than in other media.
More:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/03-16
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)The Tascon List is known about from word of mouth and common dialog amongst Venezuelans. The media doesn't even have to spread propaganda for "57 percent of respondents were at least somewhat concerned that people could face reprisals for how they vote," with only 42 percent "very confident their votes would be kept secret."
In the 2012 primaries they tried to get the voter lists:
Fortunately the opposition was not going to allow the Cuba-style nepotism-cronyism actually affect them this time like it did with the Tascón List. Indeed a young man was killed trying to protect the privacy of the voters (fucked up how all these deaths are happening on the oppositions side).
But the executive secretary of the Democratic Unity (MUD) coalition, Ramon Aveledo, dismissed the ruling as "absurd, unconstitutional and disproportionate".
Hours later, other opposition officials said the voting records had all been destroyed.
"We gave our word to all Venezuelans who turned out to vote on 12 February that the process would be absolutely secret, both the vote and the names of the people who took part," MUD youth leader Edinson Ferrer said. Source.
Tired of the blatant propaganda without any evidence.
I mean, VTV is showing this as Capriles "crowd" (note to non-Spanish speakers; just watch what the camera man does; the massive crowd is being blocked by the reporter):
And we're supposed to think there's some sense of "balance" here?
polly7
(20,582 posts)For me, this media bias claim has been laughable since I first learned the media played a big part in the coup attempt against him. Right-wing nutcases depend on 'false and misleading' though, it's the same anywhere. And they're desperate.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...and remains the most powerful media mogul in all of Venezuela.
Funny how the guy behind the coup is still in power.