Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 05:40 AM Apr 2014

G.M. Seeks to Fend Off Lawsuits Over Switch

General Motors moved on Tuesday to prevent future safety lapses by expanding its oversight of problematic vehicles even as the automaker continued to take an aggressive legal posture in dealing with its past missteps.

General Motors has asked a federal bankruptcy judge to dismiss dozens of potentially costly lawsuits filed against the company over its handling of a defective ignition switch in millions of cars, and to bar similar cases in the future.

The legal filing, which was made late Monday in the Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, asked the judge who approved the company’s 2009 restructuring agreement to explicitly enforce a provision that shielded the “new” company from liability for incidents that took place before July 10, 2009, the day the agreement went into effect. Most of the cars in the recall were manufactured before 2009.

Though the motion was merely asking Judge Robert E. Gerber to reaffirm a protection that already existed in the agreement, it was seen as a shrewd tactic to get the cases dismissed in one move, saving the company enormous amounts of time, personnel and money that would come from fighting to dismiss each case one by one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/business/gm-seeks-to-fend-off-lawsuits-over-switch.html?emc=edit_th_20140423&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=42530878

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
G.M. Seeks to Fend Off Lawsuits Over Switch (Original Post) Sherman A1 Apr 2014 OP
How convenient... pipoman Apr 2014 #1
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
1. How convenient...
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 07:42 AM
Apr 2014

They on one hand like to pretend they are recovered from the the bankruptcy for publicity reasons, and on the other seeking to deny victims of their cost/benefit analysis which favored not retooling their engineering because the cost of doing that exceeded the potential liability.

I would like to see a law which criminally prosecutes company officials who choose cost over safety, and hide known safety defects. The criminal prosecution should allow for a separate criminal complaint for each incident resulting in injury. How many CEOs would have to go to jail for extended periods before the industries cost/benefit analysis model regarding consumer safety is deemed obsolete?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»G.M. Seeks to Fend Off La...