Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 08:46 AM Jun 2014

Asiana Airlines flight 214 crash caused by Boeing planes being 'overly complicated'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/asiana-airlines-flight-214-crash-caused-by-boeing-planes-being-overly-complicated-9562331.html



Safety board calls for Boeing to 'develop and evaluate' the way its fleet's control systems are automated

Asiana Airlines flight 214 crash caused by Boeing planes being 'overly complicated'
Adam Withnall
Wednesday 25 June 2014

The probe into the fatal crash of Asiana Airlines flight 214 on its landing in San Francisco last year has concluded that the Boeing 777’s overly complex control systems were partially to blame.

US investigators called on the manufacturer to make changes to the increasingly complicated automated controls which, they claimed, pilots no longer “fully understand”.

The inquiry into the crash, which killed three Chinese teenagers and injured nearly 200 people, was concluded yesterday by the US National Transportation Safety Board.

But the board was far from exonerating the Asiana pilots over their involvement in the accident.

Acting chairman Chris Hart said that, between them, the three veteran pilots were found to have committed between 20 and 30 errors in their final approach to San Francisco International – varying from minor to highly significant.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Asiana Airlines flight 214 crash caused by Boeing planes being 'overly complicated' (Original Post) unhappycamper Jun 2014 OP
I call bullshit on this ruling NV Whino Jun 2014 #1
I agree with you. PearliePoo2 Jun 2014 #3
That's not exactly what the NTSB said. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2014 #2

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
1. I call bullshit on this ruling
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 09:18 AM
Jun 2014

The plane may be complicated, but the fault lay squarely with the crew.

There has been discussion previously (with trof, I think) about flight training in Asian countries and, more specifically, how Asian pilots learn.

I recently had a discussion with a retired Air Force pilot who said the exactly same thing. Asian pilots are trained to learn by rote memory. It leaves them ill prepared to deal with anything out of the ordinary. In addition, there is the strict higherarchy of command, which made the third crew member wait too long to alert the pilots to the problem.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
3. I agree with you.
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jun 2014

These pilots can recite manuals from memory, front to back until the cows come home, but add an element of the unexpected and they are lost.
They don't know how to fly an airplane from the seat of their pants or their gut.
They need to climb in a Cessna 152 and practice take-offs, landings and stalls all day long until they get the basics.
Basics...as in learn to fly the fucking plane.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,658 posts)
2. That's not exactly what the NTSB said.
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 10:02 AM
Jun 2014

This article makes it sound like the cause of the accident was the complexity of the flight management system, but that's not what the NTSB concluded (if that were the case these things would have been crashing regularly, and they haven't been). They placed the blame squarely on inadequate pilot training by the airline and the crew's over-reliance on automated systems they didn't completely understand. The panel did recommend a review of ofaspects the 777's automatic flight control system: "Convene a special certification design review of how the Boeing 777 automatic flight control system controls airspeed and use the results of that evaluation to develop guidance that will help manufacturers improve the intuitiveness of existing and future interfaces between flight crews and autoflight systems." However, the board's findings and recommendations were aimed primarily at crew training, not problems with the 777.

http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2014/asiana214/abstract.html

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Asiana Airlines flight 21...