Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,864 posts)
Tue May 1, 2018, 11:40 AM May 2018

The Real Villain Behind Our New Gilded Age

*In the past two decades, growth rates in the United States have fallen to half of what they were in the middle of the 20th century. The share of income accruing to the top 1 percent has nearly doubled since the 1970s, while the share of income going to all workers has fallen by nearly 10 percent.

These are the marks of our new Gilded Age. It’s tempting to blame impersonal market forces such as globalization and automation for widening inequality. But the true villain would be familiar to anyone who lived through the previous one: market (that is, monopoly) power. . .

The era of “supply-side economics” championed by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher — which called for tax cuts, deregulation and narrow antitrust enforcement — explains a lot of our current predicament. The key assumption of that era was that markets work best when the government focuses exclusively on enforcing contract and property rights.

This theory turned out to be wrong — not because it celebrates the market but because it misunderstands it. Two centuries earlier, Adam Smith pointed out that the easiest way for businesses to earn profits is not by slashing costs and innovating but by agreeing among themselves not to compete — to exert market power to raise prices or lower wages.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/01/opinion/monopoly-power-new-gilded-age.html?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Real Villain Behind Our New Gilded Age (Original Post) elleng May 2018 OP
I blame Ronald Reagan for most of our current Sherman A1 May 2018 #1
You're absolutely right. Lonestarblue May 2018 #4
+1 byronius May 2018 #6
And The Powerful Don't Pay Squat In Taxes We Pay The Taxes PaulX2 May 2018 #2
What a crappy word salad. knightmaar May 2018 #3
I blame the Boomers pecosbob May 2018 #5
Well I'm a boomer too, and I sure didn't decide it was ok, elleng May 2018 #7
Precisely Sherman A1 May 2018 #8
The media like to frame the supply vs demand side discussion as an on-going debate. KPN May 2018 #9

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. I blame Ronald Reagan for most of our current
Tue May 1, 2018, 12:07 PM
May 2018

Economic and social ills which I truly believe are linked to the new Gilded Age. Something I figured out was happening in the 1980s when they were creating this mess.

Lonestarblue

(9,971 posts)
4. You're absolutely right.
Tue May 1, 2018, 02:11 PM
May 2018

Reagan was the beginning of the policies that started destroying the middle class and moving the country’s wealth to the top few. I remember that presidency well, and I still have a book that I should probably reread (as if I don’t have enough to make me angry these days 😠 , The Politics of Rich and Poor, Wealth and the American Electorate in the Reagan Aftermath, by Kevin Phillips and published in 1990. Reagan did a lot of damage, especially to the poor, and subsequent Republican presidents have kept up the onslaught. I’ve always thought Reagan was a closet racist, but Nixon carried racist policies even further with the Southern Strategy and the War on Drugs. Every Republican presidential candidate to date has carried the Reagan torch and pushed the same old disasterous economic policies. But so far Republicans have won the social/culture war. That’s what keeps getting them elected.

knightmaar

(748 posts)
3. What a crappy word salad.
Tue May 1, 2018, 01:59 PM
May 2018

The era of “supply-side economics” ... does not explain anything relevant to this article. "Supply side economics" refers to giving large tax breaks to corporations on the expectation that they will get larger and hire more people.

That has nothing to do with the assumption that the free market will prevail. Those just happen to be two orthogonal beliefs held by certain groups of people. (Reagan may have believed both, but Bush the first called supply-side economics "voodoo"

The Adam Smith quote refers to anti-trust, which has very little to do with "free market philosophy" and nothing to do with supply-side economics.

pecosbob

(7,534 posts)
5. I blame the Boomers
Tue May 1, 2018, 02:43 PM
May 2018

...that means me, too. A whole generation decided it was okay to outsource their moral responsibilities as long as they made a buck.

elleng

(130,864 posts)
7. Well I'm a boomer too, and I sure didn't decide it was ok,
Tue May 1, 2018, 04:41 PM
May 2018

supported virtually nothing reagan did.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
8. Precisely
Wed May 2, 2018, 04:37 AM
May 2018

I refuse to blame an entire generation of folks who for the most part tried to play by the rules and just get through the day. This was organized theft by Ronald Reagan and his playmates.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
9. The media like to frame the supply vs demand side discussion as an on-going debate.
Sun May 6, 2018, 10:12 AM
May 2018

It is not. The data clearly show, and have shown for decades now, that supply side economics is an abysmal failure in terms of jobs, wages, and widely shared prosperity. The benefits of supply side accrue to the wealthy capitalist as opposed to the working class. ... It's all just a heaping pile of steaming bullshit that apparently too many voters are too brainwashed to see.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»The Real Villain Behind O...