Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,689 posts)
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 04:06 PM Jul 2020

Can We Create All the Money We Need?

Over the past decade, government debt in the U.S. and elsewhere has reached unprecedented heights. Yet the supposed costs of this debt are nowhere to be seen. Excessive debt, we’ve been warned, will lead to mass flight by investors and spiking interest rates, or else spiraling inflation and a collapse in the currency. But in the U.S. and elsewhere, record-high public debt has been accompanied by record-low interest rates and low inflation.

These developments have opened the door for a revival of old-fashioned Keynesian views, in which government deficits are seen not as a problem to be solved but a useful tool of demand management—and today an essential source of economic recovery.

Many mainstream economists have backed away from the view that deficit-financed public spending is necessarily risky or counterproductive. Space has also opened in public debate for non-mainstream thinkers who argue full-throatedly for a bigger, more active public sector, freed from imaginary financial constraints. The most visible of these today is the school called Modern Money Theory or Modern Monetary Theory (both terms are used), or MMT.

Both supporters and opponents tend to present MMT as a monolith, a doctrine that breaks radically with established schools of thought and must be accepted or rejected in its entirety. But in my view it’s better—both more accurate and more productive—to see it as a body of arguments within an older Keynesian tradition of economics. Contrary to the sense you might get from both supporters and detractors, it’s not a crystalline logical structure where, if you remove one piece, the whole thing collapses. Rather, like most emerging bodies of thought, it’s a ramshackle assemblage of parts built at different times for different purposes, tied together with loose solder of association and inference rather than tight bonds of deduction.

Read more: https://prospect.org/culture/books/mmt-can-we-create-all-the-money-we-need/
(American Prospect)

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can We Create All the Money We Need? (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jul 2020 OP
The US economy in the past year will be a test of MMT theory jmbar2 Jul 2020 #1
+1 sandensea Jul 2020 #3
So long as oil is traded only in USD ... Laelth Jul 2020 #2
Learned something new from you today. jmbar2 Jul 2020 #4
Learned something new from you today. jmbar2 Jul 2020 #4

jmbar2

(4,920 posts)
1. The US economy in the past year will be a test of MMT theory
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 04:13 PM
Jul 2020

Unfortunately, if it's wrong, we are all f*cked.

sandensea

(21,717 posts)
3. +1
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 06:32 PM
Jul 2020

The rest of the world has been terrified at the thought of dropping the dollar as the global reserve currency. The Dubya Debacle proved that.

But if they ever do, it's hello Argentina.



A million (old) Argentine pesos; they were worth about $10 when replaced by a new currency in 1983 (which has since been replaced twice).

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
2. So long as oil is traded only in USD ...
Tue Jul 14, 2020, 04:37 PM
Jul 2020

... we can print as many of them as we like. Foreign countries will ALWAYS buy USD (i.e. subsidize our national debt) because they need USD to buy oil in the event of a disruption in the global oil market.

This dynamic is neither predicted nor accounted for in Keynesian economic theory, but it’s true, regardless.

-Laelth

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Can We Create All the Mon...