Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:25 PM Mar 2015

Filing for bankruptcy

My ex and her husband bought a home in 2006 on an ARM (adjustable rate mortgage). Not too bright. Here's the thing...they took out against the house to the hilt. Remodel, exotic vacations, car, etc...

It all fell apart after the crash in 2008 when the ARM started to balloon and the home's value took a big drop.

They declared bankruptcy and got their debt wiped out.
My question is...how was this debt absorbed? Through raised interest for the rest of us? By the lender? U.S. taxpayers? Combination?

I ask this because they are so damn quick to bash Obama as a "socialist" among other nonsensical rants against the "government" and I am looking for knowledge of just how big of hypocrites they are in getting their debt erased.

P.s...I just learned they bought another house. That was quick. I had know idea you could buy another place after only three or four years away from a bankruptcy.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Filing for bankruptcy (Original Post) SHRED Mar 2015 OP
I don't know the details, as to 'how was this debt absorbed,' elleng Mar 2015 #1
The way I understand it, it's a "Write Down" A HERETIC I AM Mar 2015 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #3
A very long time ago a bankruptcy meant you SheilaT Jun 2015 #4

elleng

(130,740 posts)
1. I don't know the details, as to 'how was this debt absorbed,'
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:44 PM
Mar 2015

depends to some extent on to whom the debt was owed, but would say that their decisions have not been socially positive, just good for them. (I do realize that bankruptcy is and has been for a long time a legally acceptable way to deal with debt.)

A HERETIC I AM

(24,362 posts)
2. The way I understand it, it's a "Write Down"
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:21 PM
Mar 2015

The actual money they were given with which they bought the house and everything else came from the sale of bonds.

Those bonds and billions of dollars worth of others were written down (not "off) such that their Par Value of $1000 a piece settled or will settle for, in some cases pennies on the dollar, if not default to zero.

The losers in that scenario were those individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, banks etc. that bought the bonds. That's where the debt was "absorbed" as you put it. They bought bonds they anticipated would pay interest for a specific length of time and at the end of that time they would get their initial investment back.

The result of this all was in part good and in part, bad.

The good is that lenders tightened requirements back to where they should be and as a result the quality of bonds issued in this sleeve are able to properly earn and be given better (higher) credit ratings.

The bad is that now it is much more difficult for many millions of Americans to get a mortgage and other high end credit.

Response to SHRED (Original post)

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. A very long time ago a bankruptcy meant you
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 10:16 AM
Jun 2015

couldn't borrow money for a long time. Then all the banks and credit card companies figured out that if the previous debt had been wiped out, you now had the means to pay for new debt. The most the new creditor knows is how much debt was wiped out in the bankruptcy, and probably not even that. All they see is someone with a certain income and no debt.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Filing for bankruptcy