Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lordsummerisle

(4,651 posts)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:55 PM Dec 2015

Vanguard Investors May Be In For a Shock

Last edited Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:46 PM - Edit history (1)

from David Cay Johnson:

If you are among the 20 million Americans saving for retirement through Vanguard, you may be in for an expensive shock. The nation’s second-largest mutual fund company (after Fidelity) is under fire for not taking more of your money. That sounds ridiculous, but based on arcane provisions of the endlessly complex U.S. tax code, the Pennsylvania-based company may soon be forced to pay a staggering amount of back taxes because of the famously low fees it charges to manage your nest egg.

http://www.newsweek.com/vanguard-whistleblower-tax-dodge-complaint-400901

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vanguard Investors May Be In For a Shock (Original Post) lordsummerisle Dec 2015 OP
Hmm. Fidelity's 500 Index Fund has a 0.05% expense ratio progree Dec 2015 #1
What bothers me about this story lordsummerisle Dec 2015 #2
I think something of that magnitude is about as likely to happen as a big rise in the capital gains progree Dec 2015 #3
I was thinking the same thing lordsummerisle Dec 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Dec 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author progree Dec 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author A HERETIC I AM Dec 2015 #7
Let me get this straight. klook Jan 2016 #8
My thoughts as well. n/t lordsummerisle Jan 2016 #9

progree

(10,892 posts)
1. Hmm. Fidelity's 500 Index Fund has a 0.05% expense ratio
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 10:40 PM
Dec 2015

Last edited Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:22 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/fusvx/quote.html

So I doubt very much that Vanguard is going to have to charge $8.20 per $1,000 (0.82%) in "expenses" that they don't have, while Fidelity gets away with an expense of $0.50 per $1,000 (0.05%). Unless Fidelity is cheating too.

Similarly Schwab's S&P 500 index fund's expense ratio is 0.09%. So I guess Schwab is cheating too.

http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/SWPPX/quote.html

http://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/investing/accounts_products/investment/mutual_funds/schwab_mutual_funds/equity/index

And will they also go after credit unions, which are member-owned and similarly structured? About 10 years ago, the banks whined about the advantages credit unions were getting, but legislation to "fix that" was soundly defeated.

lordsummerisle

(4,651 posts)
2. What bothers me about this story
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:05 PM
Dec 2015

is the whistleblower...usually you become a whistleblower to do the right thing and expose wrongs. In this case David Danon could actually become a multi-billionaire for doing this...

progree

(10,892 posts)
3. I think something of that magnitude is about as likely to happen as a big rise in the capital gains
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:27 PM
Dec 2015

tax rate or the estate tax rates. I'm sure a lot of congress people and wealthy people have Vanguard investments, given that it has 1/5 of the market. And, practically speaking, Congress funds the IRS, and is already putting a hard squeeze on it.

lordsummerisle

(4,651 posts)
4. I was thinking the same thing
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:58 PM
Dec 2015

I'm guessing there are enough influential Vanguard investors to make sure that it can continue to provide its services without additional costs...

Response to lordsummerisle (Original post)

Response to A HERETIC I AM (Reply #5)

Response to progree (Reply #6)

klook

(12,151 posts)
8. Let me get this straight.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:40 PM
Jan 2016

Vanguard is being punished because it doesn't charge the same ripoff fees that other mutual fund companies do?

Fucking ridiculous.

This jerk's "whistleblower" complaints are nothing but self-serving trolling.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Vanguard Investors May Be...