A University of Louisville job ad excluded whites and Asians. Is that OK?

[n2doc]

By Colleen Flaherty

Even before the recent, widespread student protests over campus climate issues, many colleges and universities were working to make their faculties more diverse. But can a department specifically reserve a position for an underrepresented minority candidate? That’s what some are asking after a job ad for an assistant professorship reserved for nonwhite, non-Asian Ph.D.s was abruptly deleted from a jobs site on Tuesday.

The post (inactive but still cached here) on HigherEdJobs mostly resembled a typical ad, encouraging applicants “with a Ph.D. in physics or a related area, a strong research record and a passion for teaching” to apply. It also included a standard equal employment opportunity statement saying the University of Louisville is “an affirmative action, equal opportunity, Americans with disabilities employer, committed to community engagement and diversity, and in that spirit, seeks applications from a broad variety of candidates.”

But just under that statement, the ad continued, “The Department of Physics and Astronomy announces a tenure-track assistant professor position that will be filled by an African-American, Hispanic American or a Native American Indian .” The ad, posted in mid-October, was taken down after the department received a complaint that the preferences didn’t include applicants with disabilities, said C.S. Jayanthi, chairwoman of physics and astronomy. She said she forwarded the complaint to administrators, and the ad was promptly removed.

In the interim, others have questioned the broader legal issues raised by a job ad limiting a faculty search to members of select racial and ethnic groups. “I’ve never seen that before and it strikes me as inappropriate,” said Benjamin Reese Jr., vice president and chief diversity officer at Duke University and president of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education.

more

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/inside_higher_ed/2015/12/university_of_louisville_job_ad_excluded_whites_and_asians.html

no, it is not IMO. Having been a part of several faculty searches you want to cast the broadest net, and then you have the broadest range of choices. Faculty search committees have a lot of latitude to choose using their own metrics. But they were stupid here to be blatant about their biases.

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

1. For Physics?

Sounds like a stupid move.

I could maybe see it if they wanted a woman to teach Women's studies, or an AA prof to teach African American Studies - ie, try to avoid the 'Dolezal' candidates, with people trying to 'teach' from life experiences they don't and really can't have. But physics is universal, like math.

[bluestateguy]

2. No.

That's not affirmative action. It's a quota and a racially restrictive job opportunity.

[davidpdx]

3. I always thought that was a no no

in terms of advertising positions to a specific race.

The sad thing is here in Korea we still see it all the time. They will specify either male or female and will sometime say Caucasian in the ads. They are about 20 years behind us in terms of labor laws.