Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(35,773 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:16 PM Apr 2016

Livestock and Climate Change: Facts and Fiction



One argument often made is that U.S. livestock GHG emissions from cows, pigs, sheep and chickens are comparable to all transportation sectors from sources such as cars, trucks, planes, trains, etc. The argument suggests the solution of limiting meat consumption, starting with “Meatless Mondays,” to show a significant impact on total emissions.

When divorcing political fiction from scientific facts around the quantification of GHG from all sectors of society, one finds a different picture.

Leading scientists throughout the U.S., as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have quantified the impacts of livestock production in the U.S., which accounts for 4.2 percent of all GHG emissions, very far from the 18-51 percent range that advocates often cite.

Comparing the 4.2 percent GHG contribution from livestock to the 27 percent from the transportation sector, or 31 percent from the energy sector in the U.S. brings all contributions to GHG into perspective. Rightfully so, the attention at COP21 was focused on the combined sectors consuming fossil fuels, as they contribute more than half of all GHG in the U.S.



Interesting stuff.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Livestock and Climate Change: Facts and Fiction (Original Post) HuckleB Apr 2016 OP
As somebody eating a steak right now, that is good news. Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #1
Still, we should encourage livestock owners... Blanks Apr 2016 #2
Indeed. -eom- HuckleB Apr 2016 #3


(4,835 posts)
2. Still, we should encourage livestock owners...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 12:27 PM
Apr 2016

To capture the methane gas and use it for fuel. That would also reduce the runoff from feed lots into water sources.

Which I'm told is quite a problem.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Livestock and Climate Cha...