Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sue4e3

(731 posts)
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:22 AM May 2016

Habitat Quality Drives Birds' Reproductive Success

Five songbird species in California's oak woodlands each seek out a different habitat to maximize their reproductive success, according to new research in The Auk: Ornithological Advances.

The quality of a bird's habitat can be a crucial factor in its reproductive success, and it's an important part of managing land for sensitive species. However, it's hard to measure habitat quality directly, so biologists often turn to occupancy rates instead, reasoning that birds will tend to build their nests in better habitats. For this study, Megan Milligan and Janis Dickinson of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology focused on five species--the Ash-throated Flycatcher, House Wren, Oak Titmouse, Violet-green Swallow, and Western Bluebird--tracking their use of nest boxes in different habitat types and how successful they were.

From 1990 to 2001, researchers checked 360 nest boxes in the oak woodlands of California's Monterey County every week during the breeding season. When they classified the vegetation surrounding each box, they found that each species differed in kinds of habitat it tended to use. House Wrens, for example, preferred sites with less grassland and plenty of riparian vegetation, while Violet-green Swallows tended to favor chaparral and avoid riparian corridors. These differences could reflect preference for different habitats, or they could be a less preferred outcome of competition for the best habitat types. Occupancy was the best predictor of nest success for all five species, suggesting that box occupancy is a good indicator of habitat quality and that each species' use of habitat represents a preference, rather than exclusion from better habitats due to competition.
http://www.sciencenewsline.com/news/2016051816220015.html

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Habitat Quality Drives Bi...