Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gordon Butte (400 MW) Pumped Storage Hydro Project (in Montana, gets OK from FERC.) (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Dec 2016 OP
We have the Salina pumped storage project here madokie Dec 2016 #1
I am excited by FogerRox Dec 2016 #2
400 Megawatts for how many hours? hunter Dec 2016 #3

madokie

(51,076 posts)
1. We have the Salina pumped storage project here
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 05:59 AM
Dec 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salina_Pumped_Storage_Project

and it saves us tons of money due to the fact it levels out the hydro and coal, which is being phased out for Gas, generation.
I used to fish this 750 acre, 185 ft deep, lake mostly for large mouth bass. The water is clear and the thermocline is about 40 to 50 feet down during the heat of summer so thats where you fish if you want lots of Big ass bass. A simply beautiful lake. No gasoline powered boats allowed.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
3. 400 Megawatts for how many hours?
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 11:57 PM
Dec 2016

In these projects nobody ever wants to answer the obvious questions.

Sure, I could dig through pdf documents or do the math myself, but why should I have to?

More importantly, is prolonging or expanding the use of conventional coal power plants a desirable thing to do? That's mostly what this is about.

Montana has about a quarter of the nation's estimated coal reserves and coal is by far the state's dominant electric power source.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Gordon Butte (400 MW) Pum...