Detailed look at the global warming hiatus again confirms that humans are changing the climate
For years, the global warming hiatus from 1998 to 2012 puzzled scientists and fueled skeptics looking to cast doubt on the very idea that Earths temperature has been on the rise, largely because of human-produced greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide and that significant policy changes would need to be made to keep that rise in check.
Recent papers have begun to chip away at the idea of the slowdown. Now,
a new analysis in the journal Nature brings together many of those arguments to show that the hiatus may not have been quite what it seemed.
A combination of changes in forcing, uptake of heat by the oceans, natural variability and incomplete observational coverage reconciles models and data, the researchers from the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science in Switzerland wrote. Combined with stronger recent warming trends in newer datasets, we are now more confident than ever that human influence is dominant in long-term warming.
Below, we sort through a few of the issues with the hiatus and the lessons scientists learned from it.
--- Snip ----
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-global-warming-hiatus-20170503-htmlstory.html
And the study itself:
Reconciling controversies about the global warming hiatus
Abstract: Between about 1998 and 2012, a time that coincided with political negotiations for preventing climate change, the surface of Earth seemed hardly to warm. This phenomenon, often termed the global warming hiatus, caused doubt in the public mind about how well anthropogenic climate change and natural variability are understood. Here we show that apparently contradictory conclusions stem from different definitions of hiatus and from different datasets. A combination of changes in forcing, uptake of heat by the oceans, natural variability and incomplete observational coverage reconciles models and data. Combined with stronger recent warming trends in newer datasets, we are now more confident than ever that human influence is dominant in long-term warming.
https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v545/n7652/full/nature22315.html