Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumLet's bring back the Dirigibles.
Not sure how many DU's watch the show :Alex Ruins Everything" but I saw an episode recently on air travel. Not a pretty picture, especially after deregulation of the airlines by the FAA with a push from Ralph Nader. It lead to a demise of regional airports and an increase in hubs as well as a reduction in the number of airlines. Surprise, the free market does not always work as many costs are not factored into the equation properly. Use of dirigibles (much safer today) could be an answer to medium distance travel and have a much lower cost in terms of infrastructure investment needed. I tink I might enjoy such a trip.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)I saw a cool investigative show that indicated that dirigible had been painted with a very flammable substance
Im with you bring them back
NNadir
(33,515 posts)Not a good idea.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)Greenhouse gas, noted. I change my vote for a thermal airship
These can be filled with hot air but only about 30% as efficient
c-rational
(2,592 posts)flotsam
(3,268 posts)I flew on a Virgins Lightships blimp in the early 90's. Weight and balance are critical. Passenger weights are totaled and 5 lb shot bags are added or removed. The ship needs a slight negative buoyancy on takeoff because fuel will burn off during flight and too much lift makes landing difficult. Sudden downpours can be catastrophic as the weight of the rain on the envelope exceeds 200 lbs. Max flight speed is about 40 knots meaning no flight into high winds. It was a ton of fun but nowhere near practical for scheduled passenger service.
RainCaster
(10,870 posts)The earth will appear flatter, so I'm for it.
Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)ones that run on antimatter housed in thermite coated asbestos.
sorry