Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 12:09 PM Apr 2019

Judge: Resumption of US coal sales by Trump needs review

Source: Associated Press

Judge: Resumption of US coal sales by Trump needs review

By MATTHEW BROWN
April 19, 2019

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — A federal judge on Friday ruled that the Trump administration failed to consider potential damage to the environment from its decision to resume coal sales from U.S. lands, but the court stopped short of halting future sales.

U.S. District Judge Brian Morris in Montana said Interior Department officials had wrongly avoided an environmental review of their action by describing it “as a mere policy shift.” In so doing, officials ignored the environmental effects of selling huge volumes of coal from public lands, the judge said.

The ruling marks another in a string of judicial setbacks for President Donald Trump’s attempts to boost North American energy production.

A previous order from Morris blocked the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would transport crude from Canada’s oil sands. Other courts have issued rulings against the administration’s plans for oil and gas leasing and coal mining.

-snip-

Read more: https://apnews.com/158a17ee8382461dbc5c610491c47064

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Resumption of US coal sales by Trump needs review (Original Post) Eugene Apr 2019 OP
I know another 'mere policy shift" that needs to happen... Chin music Apr 2019 #1

Chin music

(23,002 posts)
1. I know another 'mere policy shift" that needs to happen...
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 12:19 PM
Apr 2019

the one about not indicting a sitting president. It's just a policy. Not a law. Let's just shift that too.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Judge: Resumption of US c...