Bezos' Plan Too Big For Green Orgs, Too Small To Save Earth - But Poss Just Right For Politics

[hatrack]

EDIT

He didn’t say much else. It’s not clear where the money will go, or how fast Bezos will spend it. He didn’t lay out a theory of change. In a 127-word Instagram post that doubled as a press release, he said only that a new entity, the Bezos Earth Fund, would support “scientists, activists, [and] NGOs—any effort that offers a real possibility to help preserve and protect the natural world.”

This gift is undeniably important. It could, by some estimates, virtually double the amount spent on climate change by American philanthropists today. And it will likely reveal something counterintuitive about the state of global climate action. Even if you believe, as Bezos does, that climate change is “the greatest threat facing our planet,” spending $10 billion to fight it is still pretty difficult.

Why? The first issue is organizational. “Dropping a big, fat check into the water is not necessarily going to make the sharks all swim in the same direction. It’s going to be either a feeding frenzy or a total mess until things get sorted out, and unfortunately we don’t have time to waste,” Daniel Firger, the managing director of Great Circle Capital Advisors, a climate-finance consulting firm, told me. (Until last year, Firger worked for the climate philanthropy of Michael Bloomberg, the Democratic presidential candidate and former New York City mayor.) But the deeper challenge has to do with scale and imagination. There are only so many nonprofits and experts working on climate change. If a successful group has an annual budget of $10 million, then giving it $50 million will not necessarily make it five times as effective. Many helpful projects are probably too small for Bezos. “Across the entire landscape, there are not enough people and projects that can take the kind of capital we need,” Firger said.

EDIT

Where could $10 billion go the furthest? It just may be politics. In 2016, the network of conservative groups run by the industrialists Charles and David Koch promised to spend about $900 million on the presidential election. Two years later, it pledged about $400 million to the 2018 congressional midterms. Both of those amounts, widely covered as unprecedented interventions in the political system, represented not only the personal donations of the Kochs but the pooled contributions of hundreds of like-minded donors. But with his $10 billion, Bezos could single-handedly spend comparable amounts on every presidential and midterm election from now to 2050—supporting climate-friendly members of Congress, governors, and presidents. Once in office, those politicians could then shake loose far more than $10 billion for tunnels, new rail projects, and everything else.

EDIT

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/02/jeff-bezos-will-struggle-spend-10-billion-climate-change/606733/

[still_one]

1. It remains to be seen where the money will go, but I believe it was mentioned through grants. It is

a good start and should be applauded, and encourage him to donate more to politicians who could actually push for climate-friendly legislation.

[Finishline42]

2. Give a $1 million for 5 years a year to school systems to buy solar

or wind.

In the 1st stage fund a number, say 5, solar system at very visible schools in the district with video boards that show the amount of taxes saved with the solar. Saved today, this month, this year, projected 30 years savings.

In the 2nd stage, do a fund matching, similar to how schools would use the PTA to fund local projects. It would also make sense to change the tax code to somehow make up for the 30% disadvantage non-profits currently have in pricing.

Schools are very good fit. Most have plenty of usable space, parking lots, fields, etc. Plus their need is mainly during the day.

Solar programs are better as a long term project. They get better and cheaper with time.