Acting (Of Course!) NOAA Chief Violated Agency Ethics Over Trump's Sharpie Shitfit, Agency Rules
The head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration violated the agencys code of ethics in the fall when he rebuked employees for contradicting President Trumps inaccurate claim that a hurricane would hit Alabama, NOAA said Monday in a report. Neil Jacobs, NOAAs acting administrator, engaged in the misconduct intentionally, knowingly, or in reckless disregard for the agencys scientific integrity policy, according to a panel commissioned by the agency to investigate complaints against him.
On Sept. 1, Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter that Hurricane Dorian, which was then approaching the East Coast of the United States, would hit Alabama harder than anticipated. A few minutes later, the National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Ala., which is part of NOAA, posted on Twitter: Alabama will NOT see any impacts from Dorian. We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane Dorian will be felt across Alabama. Alabama was not struck by the hurricane.
Five days later, Dr. Jacobs office issued an unsigned statement calling the Birmingham offices Twitter posting inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time. That unsigned statement turned out to be the result of pressure from the White House on Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who oversees NOAA and who threatened to fire the political staff at NOAA unless the contradiction of Mr. Trump was addressed.
In Mondays report, Stephen M. Volz, an assistant administrator at NOAA who was chosen to review the complaints and make recommendations, called for the agency to better ensure the right of NOAA scientists to review, comment, and amend any official communication that relies on their scientific analysis. Mr. Volz also recommended that the agency create a formal agreement guiding interactions between NOAA and Department of Commerce officials, acknowledging the responsibility for NOAA to own the scientific content and allowing for Commerce to weigh in on policy content. And he called for NOAAs senior leadership and political officials to take scientific integrity training and then sign a statement saying they would follow those principles.
EDIT
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/15/climate/noaa-sharpiegate-ethics-violation.html