Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe Great American Death Cult: What The GOP Has Done To Science And To Its Own Voters
EDIT
This is the conventional history of right-wing populism that it was a postwar backlash against the New Deal and the Republican Partys inability or unwillingness to roll it back. The movement believed the government had been subverted, perhaps consciously, by conspirators seeking to impose some form of socialism, communism, or world government. Its paranoid style, so described by historian Richard Hofstadter, became warped with anti-intellectualism, reflecting a conflict between businessmen of certain types and the New Deal bureaucracy, which has spilled over into a resentment of intellectuals and experts. Its followers seemed prone to a disorder in relation to authority, characterized by an inability to find other modes for human relationship than those of more or less complete domination or submission. Perhaps this sounds like someone youve heard of.
But for all the virulence of conservative paranoia in American life, without the sanction of a major party exploiting and profiting from paranoia, and thereby encouraging its growth, the worldview remained relatively fringe. Some of the far rights more colorful adherents, especially the 100,000 reactionaries who joined the John Birch Society, suspected the (then-novel, now-uncontroversial) practice of adding small amounts of fluoride to water supplies to improve dental health was, in fact, a communist plot intended to weaken the populace. Still, the far right lacked power. Republican leaders held Joe McCarthy at arms length; Goldwater captured the nomination but went down in a landslide defeat. In the era of Sputnik, science was hardly a countercultural institution. In the early Cold War period, science was associated with the military, says sociologist Timothy OBrien who, along with Shiri Noy, has studied the transformation. When people thought about scientists, they thought about the Manhattan Project. The scientist was calculating, cold, heartless, an authority figure against whom the caring, feeling liberal might rebel. Radicals in the 60s often directed their protests against the scientists or laboratories that worked with the Pentagon.
EDIT
The Republican Partys turn against science was slow and jagged, as most party-identity changes tend to be. The Environmental Protection Agency had been created under Richard Nixon, and its former administrator, Russell Train, once recalled President Gerald Ford promising to support whatever auto-emissions guidelines his staff deemed necessary. I want you to be totally comfortable in the fact that no effort whatsoever will be made to try to change your position in any way, said Ford a pledge that would be unimaginable for a contemporary Republican president to make. Not until Ronald Reagan did Republican presidents begin letting business interests overrule experts, as when his EPA used a hit list of scientists flagged by industry as hostile. And even Reagan toggled between giving business a free hand and listening to his advisers (as he did when he signed a landmark 1987 agreement to phase out substances that were depleting the ozone layer and a plan the next year to curtail acid rain).
The partys rightward tilt accelerated in the 1990s. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Cold Warriors looked for another great threat, wrote science historians Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway. They found it in environmentalism, viewing climate change as a pretext to impose government control over the whole economy. Since the 1990s was also the decade in which scientific consensus solidified that greenhouse-gas emissions were permanently increasing temperatures, the political stakes of environmentalism soared. The number of books criticizing environmentalism increased fivefold over the previous decade, and more than 90 percent cited evidence produced by right-wing foundations. Many of these tracts coursed with the same lurid paranoia as their McCarthy-era counterparts. This was when the conspiracy theory that is currently conventional wisdom on the right that scientists across the globe conspired to exaggerate or falsify global warming data in order to increase their own power first took root.
EDIT
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/republican-response-coronavirus.html