Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Thu Sep 3, 2020, 07:17 PM Sep 2020

Nature Climate Change: Rate Of Arctic Warming Far Beyond Worst-Case Scenarios; 1C/Decade Since 1980

An international team of scientists brings bad news about Arctic heating: the polar ocean is warming not only faster than anybody predicted, it is getting hotter at a rate faster than even the worst case climate scenario predictions have so far foreseen. Such dramatic rises in Arctic temperatures have been recorded before, but only during the last Ice Age. Evidence from the Greenland ice cores suggests that temperatures rose by 10°C or even 12°C, over a period of between 40 years and a century, between 120,000 years and 11,000 years ago.

“We have been clearly underestimating the rate of temperature increases in the atmosphere nearest to the sea level, which has ultimately caused sea ice to disappear faster than we had anticipated,” said Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, a physicist at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, one of 16 scientists who report in the journal Nature Climate Change on a new analysis of 40 years of data from the Arctic region.

They found that, on average, the Arctic has been warming at the rate of 1°C per decade for the last four decades. Around Norway’s Svalbard archipelago, temperatures rose even faster, at 1.5°C every 10 years. During the last two centuries, as atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide climbed from an average of around 285 parts per million to more than 400ppm, so the global average temperature of the planet rose: by a fraction more than 1°C.

The latest study is a reminder that temperatures in the Arctic are rising far faster than that. And the news is hardly a shock: within the past few weeks, separate teams of researchers, reporting to other journals, have warned that Greenland – the biggest single reservoir of ice in the northern hemisphere – is melting faster than ever; more alarmingly, its icecap is losing mass at a rate that suggests the loss could become irreversible. Researchers have also confirmed that the average planetary temperature continues to rise inexorably, that the Arctic Ocean could be free of ice in summer as early as 2035, and that the climate scientists’ “worst case” scenarios are no longer to be regarded as a warning of what could happen: the evidence is that what is happening now already matches the climate forecaster’s worst case. The latest finding implicitly and explicitly supports this flurry of ominous observation.

EDIT

https://www.eco-business.com/news/arctic-heating-races-ahead-of-worst-case-estimates/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nature Climate Change: Rate Of Arctic Warming Far Beyond Worst-Case Scenarios; 1C/Decade Since 1980 (Original Post) hatrack Sep 2020 OP
Don't worry, be happy. NNadir Sep 2020 #1

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
1. Don't worry, be happy.
Thu Sep 3, 2020, 09:29 PM
Sep 2020

For the last 40 years I've been hearing - for at least half of the time right here at DU - that "renewable energy" would save the day.

Back in 1980 I believe it was "by 2020." What's it "by" now? 2040? 2050?

If this sounds like Schadenfreude, it may be, but frankly, I'd rather that I was having my nose rubbed in the dirt by people gleefully telling me I was wrong when I questioned the premise that so called "renewable energy" would save the world.

How'd it all work out?

A million solar roofs and all that...?!?

I hear that temperatures in Southern California this weekend are going to be pushing 40C, 100F or more. It's not surprising really. Next year at Mauna Loa, I expect we'll see 420 ppm of carbon dioxide, just 7 years after we first saw 400 ppm.

One hopes that none of those million solar roofs catch fire this weekend in California. That would be bad.

At least we didn't have those millions upon millions of deaths from nuclear energy Greenpeace was always telling us about. It's OK if the caps melt, as long as we don't have another Fukushima like the one that killed everyone in Japan.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nature Climate Change: R...