Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThere Is Nothing Sacred About The Number Of SCOTUS Justices (As Opposed To, Say, A Living Planet)
The Republican-controlled Senate, by any measure, is acting dishonorably as it moves to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the high court: having previously declared that Presidents in their last year in office should not be able to nominate a new Justice, it reversed this McConnell rule when it served them to do so. The Trump years have been so ugly that this hypocrisy doesnt stand out as sharply as it should, but it is an ignoble thing to have done and, in Barretts case, to have gone along with.
Still, its not the most remarkable thing about the moment. For me, anyway, that came when Senator John Kennedy, of Louisiana, asked Barrett if she had an opinion on climate change. Ive read things about climate change, she said. I would not say I have firm views on it. Its hard to imagine that an intelligent and highly educated person, such as Barrett, would not have reached a conclusion on the key questions facing the future of life on earth: Is global warming dangerous, and is it caused by humans? Neither of these positions is controversial among the scientific community, nor, for that matter, in the Catholic community where Barrett makes her spiritual home. Pope Franciss lengthiest and most important encyclical, Laudato Si, takes on the climate crisis with a philosophical and sociological depth that few others have even attempted. The Popes newest encyclical, Fratelli Tutti, released this month, covers much the same ground, and he has helpfully produced a TED talk that makes the point in much sharper terms. We must act now, he said, which is what every scientist studying the crisis has said, too.
My guess is that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, of Rhode Island, probably explains such evasiveness best. After years of tracking the influence of dark money on the courts (as he demonstrated at Barretts hearings), he was one of nine Senate Democrats who last week released a vital report. Titled Whats At Stake: Climate and the Environment, it explains the legal doctrines that the courts will likely use to make the regulation of greenhouse gases more difficult (unitary executive theory and the non-delegation doctrine chief among them, which Abbie Dillen discusses in an interview below). Whitehouses bête noire is Charles Koch, who has reportedly spent millions of dollars backing Barretts nomination, and who is among the nations biggest oil and gas barons. His Americans for Prosperity group has been ridiculing clean energy for yearsback in 2008, it offered free balloon rides over crucial states as part of a Hot Air tour attacking solar and wind energy. (As the Pope pointed out in his recent encyclical, often the voices raised in defense of the environment are silenced or ridiculed, using apparently reasonable arguments that are merely a screen for special interests.)
It is clear, first, that regulation is going to be essential to bring greenhouse gases under control, and, second, that its going to have to happen fast. The worlds climate scientists have stated plainly that the next decade represents the critical time frame: without fundamental transformation by 2030, the chances of meeting the Paris accords climate targets are nil. Given Barretts performance at her hearings, it seems doubtful that shell let America play its roleif youre not even clear that climate change is real, how much latitude will you give government agencies to attack it? As with so many things about climate change, the problem is ultimately mathematical. Joe Biden, should he be elected, acting not out of anger but out of sorrow at Republican gamesmanship, could make sure that the will of the people, not just the will of Charles Koch, is represented on the bench. The composition of the Supreme Court has varied over time from five Justices to ten; eleven seems like the right number for 2021. Or maybe thirteen.
EDIT
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/theres-nothing-sacred-about-nine-justices-a-livable-planet-on-the-other-hand
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)It can be any number as established by Congress.