Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWhat Today's Euro Elections Mean for Energy (Forbes)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christophercoats/2012/05/06/what-todays-euro-elections-mean-for-energy/
Christopher Coats, 5/06/2012
What Today's Euro Elections Mean for Energy
As this blog outlined last week, the French election was sure to have an impact on energy development issues far beyond Paris, both in terms of European funding institutions and nuclear support. As we inch past midnight in Europe and the polls show that President Nicolas Sarkozy is no longer,its worth looking at what a François Hollande administration is going to mean for energy efforts across Southern Europe.
For one, Hollande has made it clear that he will reverse Sarkozys support for nuclear energy expansion, pledging to close older facilities and sidestep the outgoing presidents promise to extend plant life from 40 to 60 years. In a country that depends on nuclear for 75 percent of its energy needs, Hollandes approach is sure to demand some serious political will, especially to get anywhere near his stated goal of reducing dependence on the sector to 50 percent within the next 13 years. The loss of Sarkozys support in France marks another blow for European nuclear energy, including the shelving of a campaign to reintroduce the sector to Italy after a two-decade ban. Presented by Silvio Berlusconi as a pillar of his energy policy, Italys nuclear return was abandoned after Japans Fukushima reminded Italians of why they ditched it in the first place Chernobyl.
However, Sarkozys loss this weekend wasnt the only contest going on in Europe and in terms of energy development and investment, its probably not the most important. Over in Athens, the long standing conservative New Democracy Party and the main socialist party, Pasok were both punished by voters for their role in austerity measures meant to satisfy bailout requirements. In their place, Greek voters offered support for various parties that have opposed advice and austerity demands from Brussels and Berlin, inviting worries that the country could soon see cracks emerge in their current lending agreements and future bailout options.
In terms of energy development, this resistance to European Union involvement and further funding schemes could threaten the countrys signature project of their renewable future the sprawling Helios solar farm a 20 billion euro effort aimed at creating 10GW by the end of the decade. Pitched by outgoing Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos last month as a pioneering source of energy and revenue for the debt-addled country, the Helios project was supposed to be an economic lifeline, especially if they could realize the possibility of plugging German consumers into the grid. However, with new leadership intent on curbing further EU involvement in the country, getting a hold of structural funds proposed by European Commission President José Manuel Barroso might be a little more difficult than project advocates had hoped.
<snip - not much more>
Christopher Coats, 5/06/2012
What Today's Euro Elections Mean for Energy
As this blog outlined last week, the French election was sure to have an impact on energy development issues far beyond Paris, both in terms of European funding institutions and nuclear support. As we inch past midnight in Europe and the polls show that President Nicolas Sarkozy is no longer,its worth looking at what a François Hollande administration is going to mean for energy efforts across Southern Europe.
For one, Hollande has made it clear that he will reverse Sarkozys support for nuclear energy expansion, pledging to close older facilities and sidestep the outgoing presidents promise to extend plant life from 40 to 60 years. In a country that depends on nuclear for 75 percent of its energy needs, Hollandes approach is sure to demand some serious political will, especially to get anywhere near his stated goal of reducing dependence on the sector to 50 percent within the next 13 years. The loss of Sarkozys support in France marks another blow for European nuclear energy, including the shelving of a campaign to reintroduce the sector to Italy after a two-decade ban. Presented by Silvio Berlusconi as a pillar of his energy policy, Italys nuclear return was abandoned after Japans Fukushima reminded Italians of why they ditched it in the first place Chernobyl.
However, Sarkozys loss this weekend wasnt the only contest going on in Europe and in terms of energy development and investment, its probably not the most important. Over in Athens, the long standing conservative New Democracy Party and the main socialist party, Pasok were both punished by voters for their role in austerity measures meant to satisfy bailout requirements. In their place, Greek voters offered support for various parties that have opposed advice and austerity demands from Brussels and Berlin, inviting worries that the country could soon see cracks emerge in their current lending agreements and future bailout options.
In terms of energy development, this resistance to European Union involvement and further funding schemes could threaten the countrys signature project of their renewable future the sprawling Helios solar farm a 20 billion euro effort aimed at creating 10GW by the end of the decade. Pitched by outgoing Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos last month as a pioneering source of energy and revenue for the debt-addled country, the Helios project was supposed to be an economic lifeline, especially if they could realize the possibility of plugging German consumers into the grid. However, with new leadership intent on curbing further EU involvement in the country, getting a hold of structural funds proposed by European Commission President José Manuel Barroso might be a little more difficult than project advocates had hoped.
<snip - not much more>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 965 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Today's Euro Elections Mean for Energy (Forbes) (Original Post)
bananas
May 2012
OP
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)1. Odd reasoning. It would seem to me that, in fact, the change in the Greek
government might give Greece a stronger hand in negotiating the price of its solar energy. The energy investment is not a giveaway to Greece by Northern Europeans. Greece has the sun. Countries like Germany don't have it nearly as much. The solar energy installation is in the interest of the wetter, colder climes in Europe. That generally means Northern Europe. The change in the Greek government could raise the value of the energy produced -- especially in terms of repaying Greek debt.