Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumDirect Carbon Capture: Big Oil Loves "Technology" - But "Complicated" Doesn't Even Come Close
EDIT
Of course, corporate funding is an encouraging factor, but there is a darker side to this story. Since 1950 when worldwide CO2 emissions registered 5.99B tons, emissions have increased 5-fold within only 70 years, skyrocketing to 36.42B tons in 2019 versus 23B tons at the turn of the century, or up 58% in only 20 years. Thats serious acceleration, and it readily fulfills an extraordinarily sharp upward thrusting growth curve. Its even more remarkable given the fact that 4,200,000 mt of CO2 is emitted per hour worldwide. That makes the Oxy Low Carbon plant at 1,000,000mt/year look awfully low.
In reality, direct air capture is enormously challenging (1) massive volumes of air have to be pulled to truly make it work (2) a chemical solution, like potassium hydroxide, is required to capture CO2 (3) more chemicals are added with a resulting solution heated to make white pellets of 50% CO2 (4) in turn, pellets are heated again to 900°C to concentrate CO2 into a gas that can be sequestered underground. Whew!
According to renowned physicist Klaus Lackner, director of the Center for Negative Carbon Emissions, in order to stay abreast of current emissions: If you built a hundred million trailer-size units you could actually keep up with current emissions. (Source: Elizabeth Kolbert, Can Carbon-Dioxide Removal Save the World? The New Yorker, Nov. 20, 2017) Heres more of that New Yorker interview: Lackner has calculated that an apparatus the size of a semi trailer could remove a ton of carbon dioxide per day, or three hundred and sixty-five tons a year. The worlds cars, planes, refineries, and power plants now produce about thirty-six billion tons of CO2 annually, so, he told me, if you built a hundred million trailer-size units you could actually keep up with current emissions. He acknowledged that the figure sounded daunting, Ibid.
Umm, in reference to Lackners hundred million units necessary to keep up with current emissions, what about the CO2 thats already up there? Moreover, Lackners acknowledgement of the figure sounds daunting is quite true and quite intimidating, as one hundred million (100,000,000) 55-foot units end-to-end circumnavigate the planet 42 times. Do the math! Ergo, direct air capture requires, desperately needs, frankly depends upon a coordinated herculean effort by every major nation of the planet. Hows that for scale? Hopefully, Paris 15 is not a leading indicator of responsiveness by countries to a much bigger project than their failure to reduce emissions at the source.
EDIT
https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/12/direct-air-capture-and-big-oil/
marble falls
(57,010 posts)hunter
(38,302 posts)We can quit fossil fuels using known technologies.
Then we can start filling in the hole we've dug.
Maybe we could begin by extracting carbon dioxide from seawater as a side process of electric power generation and desalinization. Raw carbon dioxide isn't likely to stay put if we simply pump it into the ground, but it could be converted to solid forms as carbonate minerals and structural materials.