Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 01:20 PM Mar 2021

Roberts Harangues Marine Monument as Appeal Runs Aground

WASHINGTON (CN) — The U.S. Supreme Court nixed a challenge Monday to a fishing ban in a massive swath of the Atlantic Ocean that the federal government enshrined as the first-of-its-kind marine monument.

That the court is selective about what cases it hears is widely known — dozens of cases are summarily rejected every week, and today’s order list proved no exception. Singling out this case for attention, however, Chief Justice John Roberts took the unusual step this morning of essentially calling it open season for challenges of the marine monument.

“A statute permitting the president in his sole discretion to designate as monuments ‘landmarks,’ ‘structures,’ and ‘objects’ — along with the smallest area of land compatible with their management — has been transformed into a power without any discernible limit to set aside vast and amorphous expanses of terrain above and below the sea,” Roberts wrote in a statement about the case.

The statute to which Roberts is referring is the federal Antiquities Act, invoked in 2016 by former President Barack Obama to designate a Connecticut-sized area of commercial fishing zone as the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument.

https://www.courthousenews.com/roberts-harangues-marine-monument-as-appeal-runs-aground/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roberts Harangues Marine Monument as Appeal Runs Aground (Original Post) douglas9 Mar 2021 OP
The Antiquities Act of 1906, signed into law by Theodore Roosevelt elleng Mar 2021 #1
So if he's against it why did the court reject the case? brush Mar 2021 #2
because he couldn't get qazplm135 Mar 2021 #3
DIdn't W designate an oceanic monument too? 2naSalit Mar 2021 #4

elleng

(130,740 posts)
1. The Antiquities Act of 1906, signed into law by Theodore Roosevelt
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 01:27 PM
Mar 2021

The Antiquities Act of 1906, is an act that was passed by the United States Congress and signed into law by Theodore Roosevelt on June 8, 1906. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiquities_Act

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
3. because he couldn't get
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 02:16 PM
Mar 2021

enough of the other Justices to agree to hear the case.
Takes more than one.

2naSalit

(86,332 posts)
4. DIdn't W designate an oceanic monument too?
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 04:34 PM
Mar 2021

Actually it was THREE marine designations.
https://grist.org/article/republican/


How come those aren't being challenged?


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Roberts Harangues Marine ...