Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBattery-powered trains could be a climate game changer. Is everyone all aboard?
latimes.com
Colossal freight locomotives are a fixture of the American landscape, but their 4,400-horsepower engines collectively burn 3.5 billion gallons of diesel annually, at a time when railroads and other fossil fuel users face pressure to reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-07-05/battery-powered-locomotives-zero-emission-train-future
Random Boomer
(4,168 posts)We have run out of time for leisurely contemplations of better technology. Batteries won't be much use when tracks are melting from runaway heat waves.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)and cheaper, but ... for new ones? Sure.
Or maybe Hydrogen fuel cells instead of batteries.
Or maybe nuclear power. We have it on subs and ships ...
paleotn
(17,911 posts)even with conventional diesel locomotives produces several times less CO2 than the same amount of freight by truck. Even intermodal is far more environmentally friendly than trucks alone. It was once a a huge part of our infrastructure with rail lines serving nearly every two horse town in America. But much of that infrastructure is gone. It needs to be rebuilt.
NNadir
(33,512 posts)How is it that no one has even a primitive notion of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a law as inviolable as the laws of gravity?
hunter
(38,310 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_locomotive
This Swiss rail line was electrified in 1922:
Hybrid electric locomotives are expected to reduce fuel consumption by 30%, but full electrification is the way to go.
China has already built electrified rail lines that can handle railroad traffic carrying double stacked containers.