Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Tue May 15, 2012, 07:36 AM May 2012

Report: Global biodiversity down 30 percent in 40 years

The world's biodiversity is down 30 percent since the 1970s, according to a new report, with tropical species taking the biggest hit. And if humanity continues as it has been, the picture could get bleaker.

Humanity is outstripping the Earth's resources by 50 percent — essentially using the resources of one and a half Earths every year, according to the 2012 Living Planet Report, produced by conservation agency the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

Colby Loucks, the director of conservation sciences at WWF, compared humanity to bad house guests.

"We're emptying the fridge, we're not really taking care of the lawn, we're not weeding the flower beds and we're certainly not taking out the garbage," Loucks said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47421743/ns/technology_and_science-science/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: Global biodiversity down 30 percent in 40 years (Original Post) IDemo May 2012 OP
This is what entering the bottleneck looks and feels like. GliderGuider May 2012 #1
Resource-wise, 4 of the 10 greediest nations are in Europe NickB79 May 2012 #2
And 3 are in the Middle East, 2/2 of the North American continent, ... Nihil May 2012 #3

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
2. Resource-wise, 4 of the 10 greediest nations are in Europe
Tue May 15, 2012, 06:03 PM
May 2012

Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Ireland.

That's at odds with everything I've heard hyped about how green these countries are with regard to renewable energy, public transit, locally-grown food, etc.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
3. And 3 are in the Middle East, 2/2 of the North American continent, ...
Wed May 16, 2012, 05:21 AM
May 2012

The correlation is with wealth & standard of living, not geography or energy source.

The problem with Denmark is probably due to the large amounts of natural gas
it burns rather than their public transport system. There again, given it was from
a biodiversity report, maybe the large (mainly monoculture) agricultural segment
did the damage to their ratings?

I'm also a little surprised about the fact that the UK didn't appear even on their
(through-linked) top 25 consumers as I would really have thought that we'd be far
worse than Norway, Sweden or France in terms of the more obvious criteria ...


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Report: Global biodiversi...