Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(64,878 posts)
Wed Feb 2, 2022, 07:34 PM Feb 2022

As Public Rage Grew, UK Environment's Top Priority Was Blocking Internal Dissent On Sewage Crisis

The internal email dropped into staff inboxes at a time when public outrage about pollution in English rivers was in full cry, generating parliamentary debates, demonstrations and mass petitions. But within the agency responsible for protecting and enhancing the environment the focus was on gagging staff with the threat of dismissal if they discussed its work both inside and outside the organisation.

Chief executive James Bevan, a former Foreign Office mandarin who was appointed in 2015 to run the regulator, issued a draconian warning silencing staff after a wave of criticism about its performance protecting rivers. Staff should not, he said, “openly criticise or discredit the organisation in the media or on social media” or “disclose any confidential information in connection with the Environment Agency to anyone who is not authorised to received it”.

EDIT

Why Bevan felt compelled to issue his message when he did can perhaps be traced back to a few weeks before in November last year, when staff were given formal instructions to shut down and stop investigating low level pollution events, so-called level 3 and 4 incidents. The memo, seen by the Guardian, clearly laid out the dire state of the organisation’s investigative and enforcement capabilities. “We do not have sufficient funding to continue to provide our current level of environment management incident response and have made it clear to government that you get the environment you pay for,” it read. “As a result, we have decided to reduce our response to unfunded low and no impact environmental incidents.”

The memo admitted this would not be popular with the public, many of whom work as volunteers to plug gaps in Environment Agency monitoring of rivers to track pollution. “This is not an easy transition and our officers and advisers are facing criticism from our customers for the reduction in our service,” it read.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jan/29/it-is-desperate-how-environment-agency-staff-were-silenced-as-pollution-worsened

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Public Rage Grew, UK Environment's Top Priority Was Blocking Internal Dissent On Sewage Crisis (Original Post) hatrack Feb 2022 OP
Glad to see Turbineguy Feb 2022 #1
This is a huge problem in many parts of "First World" Europe and the U.S.A. hunter Feb 2022 #2

hunter

(40,688 posts)
2. This is a huge problem in many parts of "First World" Europe and the U.S.A.
Wed Feb 2, 2022, 08:32 PM
Feb 2022

Ignoring sewage problems is almost part of the culture, dating back to times rivers were first used as sewers.

There are very affluent communities in California that have refused to deal with sewage problems until they were forced to by substantial state fines and penalties.

Clean water is a basic human right but it's also a responsibility.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»As Public Rage Grew, UK E...