Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHouse Republicans Attempt To Nix Military's Clean Energy Initiatives
From [link:http://desmogblog.com/house-republicans-attempt-nix-military-s-clean-energy-initiatives|DeSmogBlog
]:
Republicans on the U.S. House Armed Services Committee have decided that the militarys push for clean, renewable energy has gone far enough, and have proposed for next years budget that the Pentagon not spend a dime on renewable energy sources that cost more than traditional dirty energy.
This news comes on the heels of the Navys announcement of their new Great Green Fleet, which features an aircraft carrier and strike group that are all powered by renewable, cleaner energy sources.
The shift in policy came from the House Armed Services Committee, chaired by California Republican Howard Buck McKeon. Republicans on the committee complain that the fuel being used for the green fleet and other military renewable energy projects is too costly, and contend that the military should never spend more on a renewable energy source that is more costly than traditional petroleum.
House Republicans are absolutely right this issue is squarely about money. But it isnt the money that the Committee is spending; it is the money they are receiving, specifically from the energy industry. The 35 Republican members of the House Armed Services Committee have, combined, over their careers, received millions of dollars from the energy sector. Here are just a few examples, showing the totals that Republican members have received from the energy sector (data from the Center for Responsive Politics):
Chairman Howard McKeon $200,200
Roscoe Bartlett $156,500
Mac Thornberry $656,854 (oil industry is his largest donor.)
Todd Akin $156,500
J. Randy Forbes $117,500
Jeff Miller $144,250
Joe Wilson $207,356
Allen West $129,299
Get the full story at DeSmogBlog.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)by Big Oil and Big Coal. Morons.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)(and kids, and women, and dudes who were just standing there, and camels, and goats, and chickens, and grandmas, and other random people and critters) but we can't spend some bucks on making sure that American dollars don't go to fund international terrorism in the first place?
Penny wise and pound foolish.
tanyev
(42,540 posts)Unless it disagrees with whatever they want to do.