Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(64,878 posts)
Thu May 5, 2022, 07:45 AM May 2022

SCOTUS Willingness To Jettison Precedent Could Gut EPA's Authority On Climate In Pending Case

The leaked draft opinion that signals the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade has sparked fear not only among abortion activists, but also environmental lawyers who say the federal government should have expansive legal authority to tackle the climate crisis. The draft opinion, published by Politico on Monday, indicates that at least five conservative justices are willing to cast aside long-standing precedent to achieve major objectives on the political right, these environmental lawyers said.

That does not bode well, they said, for the Supreme Court's forthcoming decision in West Virginia v. EPA, a challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate carbon emissions from the power sector, the country's second-largest source of planet-warming pollution. “The court's dismissive attitude toward precedent … is really just another signal of a conservative majority that's eager to roll up its sleeves and fix all the issues in the law that conservatives have complained about for years,” Dan Farber, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley, told The Climate 202.

“And climate regulation is seen by conservatives as a dramatic example of regulatory overreach because Congress hasn't passed any specific laws that tell EPA to go regulate [carbon emissions],” he added.

Nathan Richardson, a professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law and a university fellow at Resources for the Future, agreed with that assessment. “This suggests the conservative justices realize they have power now and are willing to use it to achieve big goals, regardless of whether it makes the court look politicized,” Richardson told The Climate 202. “And reining in the power of administrative agencies is clearly a big part of the conservative agenda.”

EDIT

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/04/supreme-court-leak-strikes-fear-among-environmental-lawyers/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Willingness To Jettison Precedent Could Gut EPA's Authority On Climate In Pending Case (Original Post) hatrack May 2022 OP
Pollution is what it was always about, the right to pollute is worth *Trillions* /nt bucolic_frolic May 2022 #1
Ugh.nt jfz9580m May 2022 #2
They will destroy our government as a functioning entity. Midnight Writer May 2022 #3
Republicans: The Mouth May 2022 #5
My Republican family members are aghast The Mouth May 2022 #4

Midnight Writer

(25,404 posts)
3. They will destroy our government as a functioning entity.
Thu May 5, 2022, 11:12 AM
May 2022

If every regulation, every guideline, every rule by an agency has to be specifically authorized by Congressional legislation, then there will be no rules.

The Mouth

(3,414 posts)
5. Republicans:
Thu May 5, 2022, 11:56 AM
May 2022

Running on the platform that 'Government doesn't work', and then getting elected and proving it.

The Mouth

(3,414 posts)
4. My Republican family members are aghast
Thu May 5, 2022, 11:55 AM
May 2022

at the EPA regulating appliances. I mean Gina McCarthy is an order of magnitude worst than Fauci to a couple of them. "Don't mess with my refrigerator".

Half the Trumper members of my family want to completely eliminate the EQP

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»SCOTUS Willingness To Jet...