Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri May 25, 2012, 06:12 AM May 2012

Goodbye Fish and Shellfish? Meet the Biggest Threat to Our Oceans

http://www.alternet.org/water/155567/goodbye_fish_and_shellfish_meet_the_biggest_threat_to_our_oceans/

_640x424_310x220


On most days, Bill Dewey can be found wearing waist-high waders and inspecting Manila clams—the West Coast version of the littleneck—at his Washington clam farm, Chuckanut Shellfish. Under an arrangement that’s unique to the state, Dewey owns 32 acres of tidelands. Unlike land-based farms, he can only harvest when the tide recedes, leaving over a mile of mudflats, and shellfish, exposed. He gathers the clams with the help of a former tulip-bulb harvesting machine that’s carried out aboard his boat, the Clamdango!

Working on the mudflats, often with his son and dog in tow, is the fulfillment of a dream for Dewey, a shellfish farmer for more than 30 years who is also the public policy and communications director for Taylor Shellfish Company. Taylor’s operations—which include growing oysters, clams, mussels and geoduck (giant clams whose necks can reach more than three feet long)—span some 1,900 acres of the same tidelands. All told, there are about 47,000 acres of oceanic land that have that special designation in the state, and, he says, “It’s fundamental as to why Washington leads the country in farmed shellfish production. In other parts of country, you typically have to lease the land from the state. Banks are less apt to loan money to businesses that have to lease.”

Commercial shellfishing makes up the lion’s share—two-thirds—of the nation’s aquaculture industry. So reports the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) Fisheries Service which makes a case for boosting domestic seafood production, noting that Americans eat a lot of seafood, and import 86% of it, creating a U.S. seafood trade deficit that now exceeds $10.4 billion annually, second only to oil when it comes to natural resources. In the Pacific Northwest, the shellfish industry contributes $270 million per year to the regional economy and employs more than 3,200 people. And when oyster cultivation fails at the top Northwest hatcheries and farms, the effects on the industry are devastating.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goodbye Fish and Shellfish? Meet the Biggest Threat to Our Oceans (Original Post) xchrom May 2012 OP
The Pacific is Dying bahrbearian May 2012 #1
+1 xchrom May 2012 #2
I just can't get myself to eat seafood anymore Viva_La_Revolution May 2012 #3
I can't help but think that eating fish when alternative protein is available is ecocide. GliderGuider May 2012 #4
At my local Safeway they're selling tilapia from China XemaSab May 2012 #8
Ever since the BP spill the thouht of seafood turns me off. broiles May 2012 #7
Ocean Acidification--Genetically Altered Oysters--Is Ocean Acidification The Only Problem? Laurabeach1 May 2012 #5
And it's going to get worse unless we address the basic problem- population. Gregorian May 2012 #6
Acres of Clams pscot May 2012 #9
Great Voice Laurabeach1 May 2012 #14
I wish! His name is Dan Hardin pscot May 2012 #15
One video says it all Nativeone May 2012 #10
Where is that beach Located?, thanks for the pics. bahrbearian May 2012 #11
Beach Location Nativeone May 2012 #12
Or another one Nativeone May 2012 #13

bahrbearian

(13,466 posts)
1. The Pacific is Dying
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:12 AM
May 2012

Don't forget the radioactive shell fish in Willapa Bay
I used to eat shell fish from there all the time. We'd go out there every winter, not anymore.


Radioactive oysters in Willapa Bay, WA


During the 1950's and 1960's, radioactivity from Hanford was found at high concentrations in shellfish in Willapa Bay at the mouth of the Columbia which extended for at least 200 miles into the Pacific Ocean. Beginning in 1959, zinc-59 levels in the oysters at Willapa Bay were being monitored. At that time, levels of zinc-65, a radioactive byproduct of plutonium production, in Pacific coast oysters were 300 times greater oysters from Japanese and Atlantic waters. In the 1960's a Hanford employee set off radiation alarms when he entered the Hanford Site. Upon investigation it was determined that he had become radioactive from eating a can of oyster stew that contained oysters harvested from Willapa Bay.
http://toxipedia.org/display/wanmec/Radioactive+oysters...

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
2. +1
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:18 AM
May 2012

i just hate news like this -- i love oysters, clams, etc -- it's such a good industry with historical roots.

so very sad.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
3. I just can't get myself to eat seafood anymore
Fri May 25, 2012, 10:37 AM
May 2012

Even if you're sure it's labeled right, and caught fairly, that's still one less fish in the ocean.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
4. I can't help but think that eating fish when alternative protein is available is ecocide.
Fri May 25, 2012, 10:42 AM
May 2012

Catching wild fish depletes the ocean biome, while open-water acquaculture contaminates the surrounding water and thus threatens other species.

Aquaculture in inland tanks is probably OK from an ecological perspective, but not everybody wants to just eat tilapia and catfish...

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
8. At my local Safeway they're selling tilapia from China
Fri May 25, 2012, 02:31 PM
May 2012

Not to overstate it, but

:puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:

Laurabeach1

(2 posts)
5. Ocean Acidification--Genetically Altered Oysters--Is Ocean Acidification The Only Problem?
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:04 PM
May 2012

If the Washington shellfish industry is so worried about their future, why are they then demanding that Japanese eelgrass be eradicated by spraying Imazamox in Willapa Bay, Grays Harbor and Puget Sound? The importance of seagrasses to sequester carbon have been highlighted and scientists in Washington State have opposed this eradication, but the shellfish industry has demanded that the Department of Ecology continue to move forward on a spray permit. Not only does the eradication of Japanese eelgrass threaten the food source for masses of migrating birds and would eliminate documented herring spawning medium, but native eelgrass will also be at risk as it grows in close proximity.

It is even more of a concern that shellfish industry tried to avoid their name being connected with their demand to eradicate Japanese eelgrass by not wanting it to be handled by legislation. So instead, Bill Dewey (Taylor Shellfish Corporate lobbyist) drafted the letter for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to quietly sign that was then sent to Representative Brian Blake that dropped the Japanese eelgrass protection and then the shellfish industry quickly applied for spray permits. The shellfish industry's tactics denied other stakeholders the right of a public process and public hearings so all of the science could be fairly examined and all of the impacts could be openly discussed.

In order to accurately determine the true impacts on non native Pacific oysters of ocean acidification, it should also be pointed out that the shellfish industry aerially sprays tons of Carbaryl and high volumes of Glyphosate and Imazapyr in Willapa Bay and Grays Harbor to eradicate native ghost/mud shrimp and Spartina. The genetic fitness of these genetically altered oysters along with chemical stressors should be factored into this discussion. Saving native species should be our primary goal.

Taxpayers deserve all of the facts to be on the table since it is our money funding this research. We need to protect all of the natural aquatic species that provide an important function for an ecosystem that is already in trouble.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
6. And it's going to get worse unless we address the basic problem- population.
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:57 PM
May 2012

It is the bottom line for all of the ecological problems we're facing. Yet every discussion stops just short of addressing it. We think we can engineer our way out of it. We can't. There's nothing wrong with living a modern lifestyle. Just not in these numbers. And we had better hurry up and realize this.

Nativeone

(3 posts)
12. Beach Location
Sun May 27, 2012, 01:57 PM
May 2012

You can find beaches like the ones in the video all over Puget Sound. Totten Inlet is filthy with views like this (join the boat tour on June 3rd from Carlyon Beach starting at 10am) or just visit any of the several inlets in the Sound to see similar pictures. Roughly 92% of Totten Inlet is in this state of existence but the other beaches are catching up in wicked ways.

This may be of interest to you as well:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Nativeone

(3 posts)
13. Or another one
Sun May 27, 2012, 04:01 PM
May 2012

If this doesn't wake someone up, nothing will.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Goodbye Fish and Shellfis...