Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Mon May 28, 2012, 08:09 PM May 2012

French state nuclear giant puts new UK nuclear reactor "on hold"

EDF puts planned Somerset nuclear plant on hold
Uncertainty over nuclear power renaissance grows as French energy firm delays decision on Hinkley Point

Terry Macalister
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 27 May 2012 14.06 EDT


The award of a £1.2bn civil engineering contract for a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset has been put on ice by EDF Energy, triggering more uncertainty over the nuclear renaissance.

Two consortiums led by Balfour Beatty and Laing O'Rourke were hoping to have heard about the huge deal in recent days but now expect no decision until 2013 at the earliest. The move is a blow to employment prospects in the area and comes weeks after £100m worth of site preparation was postponed.

The soonest a new reactor will be built in Somerset could now be 2021, around four years later than originally hoped. EDF declined to comment on the latest setback, with a spokesman for the 83% state-owned French power company saying: "I am afraid it is not our practice to comment on open tenders."

The group insisted that its wider plans remained intact and it aimed to start work on the £100m contract, which was awarded last year to construction partner Kier Bam, "as soon as practicable, and all necessary steps are being taken to ensure that work can start in good time".

EDF says it...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/may/27/edf-nuclear-delay


(from an earlier post)
The Cameron government is going all out to build an economic platform that will support new nuclear plants. They know that should energy efficiency measures deliver the goods, they will be reducing the potential electricity sales they must have to enable the nuclear plants to run enough to pay for themselves (and even then they'll have to use subsidies).

That begs the question of why their energy efficiency program was designed to fail, and why they haven't responded to continued warnings that it will fail, doesn't it?

From December 2011
'Green deal' will fail, government's climate advisers warn
Scheme to make 14m UK homes more energy efficient will only reach 2-3m households, Committee on Climate Change says

Damian Carrington
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 20 December 2011 11.38 EST

...The daft thing is that at the same time [as delivering the green deal plan], the government has put out a national carbon budget plan that states with complete confidence that they will get all the lofts and cavity walls done - but there is no programme to do it," said Warren.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/20/green-deal-fail


May 2012
David Cameron briefed on concerns over green deal for homeowners
Impact assessment shows loft insulations and cavity wall insulations are set to fall dramatically under current plans

Damian Carrington
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 16 May 2012 11.43 EDT

...The green deal aims to provide "pay as you save" loans to homeowners to improve their energy efficiency and cut bills. It is due to launch in October but has faced widespread criticism from energy companies, the building industry, consumer groups and charities. The government's own impact assessment shows loft insulations and cavity wall insulations – the most cost-effective measures by far – are set to fall by 93% and 67% respectively under current plans. "The impact assessment says it is going to be a train crash," said Andrew Warren, director of the Association for the Conservation of Energy.

The escalation of the issue to Downing Street came on the same day as official data revealed that average home energy bills have shot up by up 12% – £140 – in 12 months, following a doubling in the past six years due largely to rising gas prices. Furthermore, national statistics on fuel poverty due to be published on Thursday are certain to show a rise from the current 5 million homes, a quarter of the total.

The green deal is intended to address fuel poverty, as well as being a crucial policy in cutting the carbon emissions driving climate change, but the Cabinet Office has been told it will flop unless fundamental changes are made. Warren and a series of other senior stakeholders were interviewed by Cabinet Office officials, who reported to Cameron, Clegg and energy secretary Ed Davey on Wednesday.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "As we implement all policy, we maintain constant dialogue with stakeholders and businesses who have an interest. The deputy prime minister and prime minister are fully committed to the green deal." While the commitment to the green deal is not under review, government sources said the implementation of the policy is being discussed...


http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/16/david-cameron-green-deal-homeowners


Ooooops. What do you know, it didn't work. Well, at least they'll have a larger market for the desired nuclear plants.


See also this study that looked at the relationship of nuclear power and the alternatives of energy efficiency and renewable energy. The study looks at the US and France, with a separate comparison among the states within the US.
States where utilities have not expressed an interest in getting licenses for new nuclear reactors have a better track record on efficiency and renewable and more aggressive plans for future development of efficiency and renewables, as shown in Exhibit ES-3. These states:
- had three times as much renewable energy and ten times as much non-hydro renewable energy in their 1990 generation mix and
- set RPS goals for the next decade that are 50 percent higher;
- spent three times as much on efficiency in 2006;
- saved over three times as much energy in the 1992-2006 period, and
- have much stronger utility efficiency programs in place.


Policy Challenges of Nuclear Reactor Construction: Cost Escalation and Crowding Out
LESSONS FROM THE U.S. AND FRANCE FOR THE EFFORT TO REVIVE THE U.S. INDUSTRY WITH LOAN GUARANTEES AND TAX SUBSIDIES
(September 2010). Dr. Mark Cooper, Vermont Law School.
Access pdf here: http://www.psr.org/nuclear-bailout/resources/policy-challenges-of-nuclear.html

Ministers must resist the siren call of spin to prevent climate failure
Trying to tackle the huge challenge with policies that contradict each other and silly spin makes a tough job unnecessarily harder


No one thinks it will be easy to slash the carbon emissions driving climate change while keeping the lights on and at an affordable price. But trying to tackle the challenge with policies that contradict each other and silly spin makes a tough job unnecessarily harder.

Ed Davey, the energy and climate change secretary, launched a good report on Friday, suggesting the damage wrought on the UK's economy by spikes in global oil, gas and coal prices could be reduced by over half in 2050 as a result of climate change policies.

"Only last year, the impact of the Arab spring on wholesale gas prices, pushed up UK household bills by 20%," he said. "Every step the UK takes towards building a low-carbon economy reduces our dependency on fossil fuels, and on volatile global energy prices."

"The more we can shift to alternative fuels, and use energy efficiently, the more we can ensure that our economy does not become hostage to far-flung events and to the volatility of market forces," he added. So far, so sensible.

But what about the impact of far-flung events on the UK's faltering ambition to build new nuclear power stations? Well, that's a completely different story, apparently. Energy minister Charles Hendry was asked exactly that on Tuesday by MPs...


http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2012/may/18/energy-climate-davey-fossil-fuel-nuclear


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
French state nuclear giant puts new UK nuclear reactor "on hold" (Original Post) kristopher May 2012 OP
Hinkley Point nuclear power station plan 'is still on track', says EDF Energy FBaggins May 2012 #1
And yet... kristopher May 2012 #2
And yet? FBaggins May 2012 #3

FBaggins

(26,714 posts)
1. Hinkley Point nuclear power station plan 'is still on track', says EDF Energy
Wed May 30, 2012, 04:54 PM
May 2012
The company preparing to build a new nuclear power station in Somerset has stressed that procurement is on track. The statement follows a claim in The Guardian that the project to build the first of Britain’s new nuclear power stations has been put on hold.

...snip...

“The procurement process is on track, and has always assumed that certain contracts would be signed once we make our final investment decision. This has not changed,” the spokesman said.

“To date, contracts worth in excess of £750 million have been let to over 370 companies.”

Last weeks’ publication of the Energy Bill confirmed the Government’s continued momentum on Electricity Market Reform. And yesterday the Government said that it was “on the cusp” of signing a deal for a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point.

http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/Hinkley-Point-nuclear-power-station-plan-track/story-16226396-detail/story.html


Related story -

http://www.democraticunderground.com/112716408

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. And yet...
Wed May 30, 2012, 05:24 PM
May 2012

From the OP

...Two consortiums led by Balfour Beatty and Laing O'Rourke were hoping to have heard about the huge deal in recent days but now expect no decision until 2013 at the earliest. The move is a blow to employment prospects in the area and comes weeks after £100m worth of site preparation was postponed.

The soonest a new reactor will be built in Somerset could now be 2021, around four years later than originally hoped. ...


"Slip sliding away
Slip sliding away
You know the nearer your destination
the more you're slip sliding away"

FBaggins

(26,714 posts)
3. And yet?
Wed May 30, 2012, 05:39 PM
May 2012

You reply to a refutation of an unsupported claim by repeating the claim?

Did you even read the two articles?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»French state nuclear gian...