Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liam_laddie

(1,321 posts)
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 06:24 PM Jun 2012

Headline is a bit misleading

475,000 litres is about 2,988 barrels (at 42 gallons per oil barrel, the standard used by most producers.)
Granted that 3,000 "is" thousands, but the 475,000 jumps out; switching the word "litres" to "barrels" way overstates the volume, probably an innocent error.
For example, this spill is equivalent to about one-third of the capacity of a typical 9,000 gallon, two-axle tanker trailer...
the type you see refilling the below-ground tanks at your local filling station. Any spill, however small, is always a disaster for the environment. Still a lot of crap in the river. Sad.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Headline is a bit mislead...