Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John ONeill

(94 posts)
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 05:51 AM Sep 2025

Finland

New study from LUT university in Finland about how much cheaper they can decarbonise with wind and solar, than with more nuclear (already at 38% of their power.) Apparently, according to their apologist on ex-Twitter, they'd need just as much new transmission for nuclear as for wind and solar. When I pointed out that the country only averages 3 hours sunlight per day all winter, he goes 'we balance with biomass.' Me - Finnish biomass is 230 grams CO2/kW hour, Finnish nuclear 5 g.
https://t.co/ze3B6dSe1E
A previous work by Mark Jacobson on the wonderful prospects for '100% WindWaterSolar' in Finland got a local response
https://passiiviidentiteetti.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/part-1-why-does-mark-jacobson-hate-finland/

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Finland