Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 07:51 PM Aug 2012

This is the state of politics in our country

and sadly, while describing a local situation in San Diego, it applies where you live. Go pay attention to your local boards. Recently we had a vote here on Wind Turbines and wind turbine projects. (But it is GREEN ENERGY...) Yes, and it still has some downsides, in fire country pretty significant down sides.

1.- Fires... you'd think that in fire country that be a pretty damn no-no

2.- They are very tall, making FIREFIGHTING more hazardous... see they use planes and choppers which have to fly in very hazardous conditions... you just added more risks for the pilots.

Anyhow, this was approved. We have our lovely board of supervisors. Did I mention it is supposed to be non political? Oh wait, never mind. All my board of supervisors members ARE REPUBLICAN... STill the only one that voted against the development... (wait what?) and is all for starting to put SOLAR all over and implementing a DISTRIBUTIVE model of energy production happens to represent the BACK COUNTRY... where well, we have those very real fire threats.

Gets even better, she did so not because of how green or how not green wind is, but because of the pretty significant fires we have had in the back country in recent years. She did it for public safety reasons. And she also knows that we need SOLAR.

Now here is another thing I want all of you to understand, we have had A LOT of Bureau of Land Management lands approved for these industrial developments... (but we need green energy), yes, yes we do, but these industrial developments are literally building up within a 20th century model of single point of distribution energy grids. We need to be really creative about this.

Care to ask why San Diego County went dark not too long ago? A SINGLE point of failure in the grid. That single point of failure turned off the lights all the way from Arizona to Ensenada, to Southern Orange County. That is a SINGLE point of failure. This is exactly what we continue to build and these companies, their life depends on this vulnerable, industrial, system of production. We have now the possibly of a mixture of both centralized and distributive energy grids. A distributive energy grid, why SEMPRA will attack it, is a direct challenge to the business model.

This is not NYMBY, this is quite frankly, being blind to different ways of possibly doing things that will increase the commons back to more people and away from very powerful energy conglomerates.

But going back to the beginning, what ails us in our politics is that pols are incapable of seeing a problem unless it affects them directly. THis is why my local supervisor voted against one of these projects... and mark my words, as more and more of these projects go on line, we will have a few fires tracked back to wind turbines.

But, but they are green and safe and wonderful, go hug a turbine! Here, some reading for you.

http://alfin2300.blogspot.com/2012/04/wind-turbines-fire-danger-to-wildlands.html

Oh here is more

Vestas Wind Turbine Catches Fire In Germany, No Injuries

Vestas Wind Systems A/S (VWS), the world’s largest wind-turbine maker, said a V112 3.0-megawatt turbine caught fire today at the Gross Eilstorf wind farm in Lower Saxony, Germany. No injuries were reported.

The cause of the 3 p.m. blaze, which is burning out under “controlled conditions,” hasn’t been determined, the Aarhus, Denmark-based company said in a statement. The turbine, a new model for Vestas, was disconnected from the grid and three nearby V112 turbines were shut for safety reasons, it said.

With many potential causes, “we can’t start any investigation until we have a chance to look at the turbine and in order to do that we have to get to the nacelle,” Andrew Hilton, a spokesman for the company, said of the casing on the tower that houses the turbine’s power-generating components.


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-30/vestas-says-turbine-catches-fire-at-gross-eilstorf-wind-farm.html

Forest fires and wind turbines: The danger no one is talking about


By Clyde MacDonald, Special to the BDN
Posted June 29, 2011, at 6:19 p.m.
Despite all that has been written about wind power, a vitally important issue has barely been mentioned. When turbines fail, blades may fall to the ground or send fragments that land up to a mile away. Turbines often catch fire, and when they do they often send flaming shards into fields and forests. Much has been said about the short-term jobs created in preparing turbine sites, but almost nothing about job losses from turbine-caused fires in our paper mills, sawmills and other forest-dependent industries.

Official information on the number and severity of turbine-induced forest fires remains largely secret and unavailable. Nonetheless, there are scattered media reports and one thorough description of the safety record of the Caithness USA Wind corporation with installations in the northwest. That one corporation experienced 110 serious wind turbine fires over a 20 year period, but there is no mention of whether some of those fires may have spread to adjacent areas.

Similarly, media references to 43 turbine fires, mostly in the U.S. and Europe, merely state “no details.” Many references do contain brief statements, such as that 22 fires were caused by lightning strikes, but again, no references to those fires spreading far from the sites. Only 25 of the reports mention that turbine fires had spread to fields and forests.


http://bangordailynews.com/2011/06/29/opinion/forest-fires-and-wind-turbines-the-danger-no-one-is-talking-about/

There are more of course, as this is just starting to become a reality.

Oh and to my REPUBLICAN member of the County Board of Supervisors, a rare clap and bravo... you did good, and it takes a lot of fortitude to go against the prevailing common sense and wisdom... but you got it, before a lot of us city dwellers did. Some of us, as reporters, get it... mostly because we "enjoy" covering fires...



Really, they would happen, this fire was due to lightning. But I guarantee you, as more and more of these go on line, we will have more and more accidents and yes, fires.

But hey, I turn the switch on and I got power... well unless that is, if I have a failure at a single point of failure... then all bets are off.

http://www.10news.com/news/29124110/detail.html
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is the state of politics in our country (Original Post) nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 OP
Just run water lines up the towers. RobertEarl Aug 2012 #1
Well, this week they had all kinds of fun nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #2
Roads to towers provide some access? RobertEarl Aug 2012 #5
Don't have to nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #6
Oh yeah? RobertEarl Aug 2012 #8
Nice, you got nothing so you attack nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #10
Somebody please clue Nadin RobertEarl Aug 2012 #12
You engaged in a personal attack. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #13
Where would the water pressure come from? XemaSab Aug 2012 #3
They have these things..... RobertEarl Aug 2012 #4
Yeah, you try miles upon miles of these on the McCain Valley nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #7
Been out there: Death Valley, even RobertEarl Aug 2012 #9
No you have not nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #11
The type of solar you're talking about, photovoltaic, only work during the day.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #14
We should still be building PVs despite what you cite as a "storage" problem Kolesar Aug 2012 #15
I don't disagree with that.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #18
Tell me, why are you repeating large electrical companies talking points? nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #19
Because you appeared to be advocating going entirely solar.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #20
Wrong, what I am advocating is understanding that all nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #21
You're making way too much sense here, Nadine pscot Aug 2012 #22
That's why I used the term "appeared", my mind reading skills have deteriorated markedly. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #25
I am skeptical that wind turbine fires are a big threat Kolesar Aug 2012 #16
You will see nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #17
. XemaSab Aug 2012 #23
Thanks this is why my republican county board of supervisors member nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #24
If the wind turbines are catching fire, maybe a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #26
That would be obvious, except for the companies nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #27
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. Just run water lines up the towers.
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:04 PM
Aug 2012

1 inch lines should be enough.

Run in the same conduit that the electric lines run back to town.

Then when a fire starts the water sprays with the wind blow and helps douse fires. You could even park pump trucks at the tower base and spray retardants from high. May never need airplanes again wit these 'new age firetowers'.

Ehhh, just an idea.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
2. Well, this week they had all kinds of fun
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:10 PM
Aug 2012

getting close to the fire and well, fighting it... it had to do with access.



 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
5. Roads to towers provide some access?
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:07 PM
Aug 2012

Wind vs. Nukes

Imagine, if you can, what a nuke plant fire around San Diego would be like. SONGS almost.... that fat lady almost sung, more than once, iirc.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
6. Don't have to
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:26 PM
Aug 2012

I got San ONOFRE.

Imagine solar on any roof, feeding energy you don't use to the grid, and giving you energy when you need it. Imagine solar on every parking lot. It would be megawatts of power, and since it's on car port like structures, it keeps your car cooler. I don't have to imagine that either... The military is doing that right now.

As I said, turbines are being sold as the green energy source. They are part f a mixture and time we think outside the box.

For the record, Southern California Eddison is living a real nightmare. They warned of rolling black outs if San Onofre remained off for the summer. It has, and no rolling black outs.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
8. Oh yeah?
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:33 PM
Aug 2012

What happens when a solar panel blows sky-high?

Oh, they claim solar is safe, and that it will be too cheap to meter and all that, but you know they lie. Wait... whut?

SONGS means: San Onofre Nookyular Generating Station. It was just re-tooled for like millions of dollars. What do you mean it is shut down? How can you survive with nookyular?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. They have these things.....
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:01 PM
Aug 2012

These things are called "PUMPS"

They pump water and since water doesn't compress much pressure is created.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
7. Yeah, you try miles upon miles of these on the McCain Valley
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:28 PM
Aug 2012


Have you been out there? I have.
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. Been out there: Death Valley, even
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:38 PM
Aug 2012

Here's the thing: if you run electric lines back to town, you just lay in some poly pipe in the same ditch. Back to town.

I'm thinking the towers go on ridges, right? Well, the road runs along the ridge and with proper mitigation the impacts may be balanced. Anyway, now that the roads are there, on the ridges, and you have water lines there too, you have stepped up your fire-fighting capabilities along with green power.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
11. No you have not
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:43 PM
Aug 2012

You think only one dimensional. Wind is good. I guess you were sold on 20th century energy distribution...

And friend the danger to fire crews, especially choppers and planes is real. Don't worry, someday you will get it.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
14. The type of solar you're talking about, photovoltaic, only work during the day..
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 05:23 AM
Aug 2012

The electricity storage problem is not yet solved, currently available batteries are not up to the job..

I have all the pieces except a battery for a near state of the art electric bicycle, I'm holding off finishing my project though because the battery technology is not yet there. Every time I get on the electric bike forum I read new stories of someone who has bricked their extremely expensive battery pack and I just can't afford to throw hundreds of dollars away. When I used to fly electric R/C planes I bricked a couple of packs that cost over a hundred dollars each when a charger malfunctioned but I was working then and had disposable income, now I'm retired and don't have the option of spending that kind of money for a rather large and smelly boat anchor.

Back then I was flying with NiCd cells which are considerably more rugged and abuse tolerant than any sort of Lithium and I still smoked two packs, one of which actually caught on fire.

Lithium batteries are a fire hazard if the electronics malfunction.

&feature=fvwrel

&feature=relmfu

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
15. We should still be building PVs despite what you cite as a "storage" problem
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 09:32 AM
Aug 2012

They could still generate huge amounts of electricity and save huge amounts of fuel.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. I don't disagree with that..
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:13 AM
Aug 2012

But something other than PV is going to be necessary to supply electricity when the sun is not shining, which can be well over 12 hours per 24 in the winter.

No one renewable source of electricity is going to do the job yet, perhaps PVs will be able to do it alone at some future point but we are nowhere near that at the current moment.

The OP is worried about windmills causing fires and hampering fire fighting efforts, I was just pointing out that Lithium cells are themselves a fire hazard if maltreated. A big pile of lithium cells once it gets burning is quite difficult to put out, they even burn underwater or in a solid block of ice once started.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. Tell me, why are you repeating large electrical companies talking points?
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:22 AM
Aug 2012

I am not sure you realize this, but you just repeated word for word what SDG&E says about photovoltaic.

So I will challenge you to look at two places. Israel, who started using solar over forty years ago for strategic reasons. Does it mean they are truly energy independent? No, not really, but they have reduced their dependence in civilian areas by quite a bit.

Look at Germany, they use a mixture of diatributive and centralized energy production. Sempra does not want you to look at either of these examples. They are truly a nightmare scenario for them. They are a direct attack on their business model.

Right now they want to continue to build on the 20th century model where yes, they control all points from production to your light switch.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. Because you appeared to be advocating going entirely solar..
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:45 AM
Aug 2012

I'm sorry that my personal experience matches SDG&E "talking points" but I have witnessed batteries catching on fire with my own eyes and I have cleaned up the damage to my personal property from fires caused by malfunctioning electronics combined with quite small batteries.

Going total solar implies some form of storage for those hours when the sun is not shining, it's unavoidable.

Another major problem with battery storage is that batteries all have a distinctly finite lifespan, both in terms of usage and just time in service, they start degrading as soon as they are manufactured and using them only accelerates the degradation process.

Flywheel motor/generators running in vacuum are one possible storage option that has a near infinite service life but research in that area seems to be lacking although Porsche has a successful hybrid race car out that uses electric flywheel energy storage.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/hybrids/porsche-911-gt3r-hybrid-flywheel

Each of the front wheels of the 911 is connected to a 60 kilowatt (80 hp) electric motor/generator. According to engineer and factory race driver Marc Lieb, two motors were used so that torque vectoring could be incorporated to help improve handling when accelerating out of a turn. Under braking, these motors produce electricity just like any other hybrid. However, instead of storing the energy in a chemical battery, the 911 has that flywheel motor. The carbon-fiber composite flywheel has magnetic material embedded in it that allows the whole mechanism to function as a motor when the electricity is fed in, accelerating it from an "idle" speed of 24,000 rpm to nearly 40,000 rpm.

At full speed the 16-inch diameter flywheel has a capacity of 0.2 kilowatt-hours, which pales in comparison to the 1.7 kwh available from the battery in the Cayenne hybrid. But the flywheel can release 163 horsepower for up to six seconds of boost—one of the performance characteristics that make it more like an ultracapacitor than a flywheel. An ultracapacitor with equivalent oomph would be substantially heavier: the flywheel and its support structure weigh in at 103 pounds. The whole mechanism is mounted in a carbon fiber box where the passenger seat would normally be in the 911.

Under the extreme power charge/discharge cycles of racing, even a lithium ion battery would face durability issues. Kristen estimates that a battery would have to be replaced three times during a race like the 24 Hours of Nurburgring, where the 911 nearly won in May 2010, after leading for over eight hours. The best current lithium ion batteries will last for a claimed 20,000-plus charge cycles, and hybrid batteries are typically only partially charged and discharged, which maximizes their life-span. Kristen claims the flywheel will last over one million cycles.

In its current form, the 911 hybrid is about 230 pounds heavier than the 911 GT3 RSRs run by the Flying Lizards team in the American Le Mans Series GT class. At its Nurburgring debut, the hybrid didn't have the outright speed of the conventional 911s, but it spent more of its time on the track thanks to its ability to achieve 25 percent better fuel efficiency. The use of so much regenerative braking, thanks to the flywheel's ability to absorb power quickly, also reduced brake wear. The brake pads on the hybrid only had to be changed once in the 24-hour race, compared to 2-3 changes for the regular version. The hybrid's on-demand all-wheel-drive should also give it a handling advantage in wet conditions.



 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. Wrong, what I am advocating is understanding that all
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:52 AM
Aug 2012

These green technologies have a clear dark side, yes even photovoltaic.

But tell me, speaking from San Diego and jobs...in your mix, do you want wind projects in areas that at best are class 2, minimum to authorize is class 3, that are on sacred Indian lands? And one of them will produce, per their admission, one permament job? Or a mixture where yes, your city government could mostly be off the grid during the day? Most city offices work 9-5, in admin buildings. They will have solar even in Winter.

Most people have been told all the marvels of wind. Sorry for bringing some of the downsides.

Should it be part f the mix? Yes, but projects are being rushed that will fail to deliver, and a few are owned by oil companies...locally one is owned by the Carlyle group.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
25. That's why I used the term "appeared", my mind reading skills have deteriorated markedly.
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 04:43 PM
Aug 2012

All technologies have downsides, I was pointing out the downsides of battery technology.

For your information I'm not a big fan of the giant windmill style wind generators, I think there are superior solutions that will eventually become dominant in the industry.

I have been putting posts up for some time now on DU about alternative wind technologies that do not require the gigantic pylons and immense blades.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=25489

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1195665

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
16. I am skeptical that wind turbine fires are a big threat
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 09:35 AM
Aug 2012

That Bangor Daily News article was not able to cite that a huge problem has been created by wind turbine fires.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
17. You will see
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 09:54 AM
Aug 2012

No, I am not kidding.

By the way the FF, I took that photo at Ranchita. They had all kinds of fun getting to the fire. Add tall towers, it will be even more fun.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
24. Thanks this is why my republican county board of supervisors member
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 02:14 PM
Aug 2012

voted against it. precisely.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
27. That would be obvious, except for the companies
Sun Aug 19, 2012, 05:08 PM
Aug 2012


They have sold a series of goods, and I think it will take a few years (the projects will be in place) for people to realize there is a problem.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»This is the state of poli...