Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumOopsy! Arctic plankton will switch from sink to source in warmer oceans
Arctic plankton will switch from sink to source in warmer oceans
Mounting evidence confirming the effects of a 5°C increase in the Arctic Ocean temperature has led an international team of researchers to issue a stark warning about the perils the world faces in the near future.
The international scientific team was led by the Director of The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute, Professor Carlos M Duarte, who said resolving the role of Arctic plankton as a source or sink for CO2 was of major importance in considering the carbon budget of the planet.
This research revealed that the two-week spring algal bloom occurring in April as the Arctic emerges from its winter darkness and the sea-ice starts to thin is so productive it can fuel the food web for the entire year and remove significant amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere on an annual basis, he said.
However, experiments involving temperature manipulations conducted in the Svalbard Islands (about 650 kilometres north of mainland Europe), indicated that the plankton community switches from acting as a sink to acting as a source of CO2 to the atmosphere at seawater temperatures in excess of 5°C. The researchers noted that this temperature will be regularly observed in the European Sector of the Arctic Ocean over the coming decades.
Mounting evidence confirming the effects of a 5°C increase in the Arctic Ocean temperature has led an international team of researchers to issue a stark warning about the perils the world faces in the near future.
The international scientific team was led by the Director of The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute, Professor Carlos M Duarte, who said resolving the role of Arctic plankton as a source or sink for CO2 was of major importance in considering the carbon budget of the planet.
This research revealed that the two-week spring algal bloom occurring in April as the Arctic emerges from its winter darkness and the sea-ice starts to thin is so productive it can fuel the food web for the entire year and remove significant amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere on an annual basis, he said.
However, experiments involving temperature manipulations conducted in the Svalbard Islands (about 650 kilometres north of mainland Europe), indicated that the plankton community switches from acting as a sink to acting as a source of CO2 to the atmosphere at seawater temperatures in excess of 5°C. The researchers noted that this temperature will be regularly observed in the European Sector of the Arctic Ocean over the coming decades.
And the hits just keep on coming. Prof. Duarte is one of the experts on the A-team that apparently briefed the WH on the collapse of Arctic ice.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1720 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (26)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oopsy! Arctic plankton will switch from sink to source in warmer oceans (Original Post)
GliderGuider
May 2013
OP
WillyT
(72,631 posts)1. K & R !!!
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. Oopsy, indeed. Nt
Javaman
(62,510 posts)3. So could this be looked at as negative feedback? nt
ArcticFox
(1,249 posts)4. I think positive, actually
Positive feedback increases the stimulus; negative feedback decrease it (from where it would be without the feedback).
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)5. You don't want an increase in CO2, also it will cause
ocean water to be more acidic, hurting the formation of shells and corals.
Javaman
(62,510 posts)6. Ahh, thanks, I knew it was something like that. :) nt
progressoid
(49,961 posts)7. Then lets get to work on the Keystone XL pipeline.