Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe End Of Fracking Is Closer Than You Think
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-end-of-fracking-is-closer-than-you-think-2014-9The Cuadrilla drilling site is seen in Balcombe, southern England August 15, 2013. An oil explorer has suspended drilling in southern England in response to the threat of an escalating protest against fracking, the controversial process used to extract gas and oil from shale deposits that has transformed the U.S. energy market.
Canadian geologist David Hughes has some sober news for the Kool-Aid-drinking boosters of the United States' newfound eminence in fossil fuel production: it's going to go bust sooner rather than later.
Working with the Post Carbon Institute, a sustainability think-tank, Hughes meticulously analyzed industry data from 65,000 US shale oil and natural gas wells that use the much-ballyhooed extraction method of hydraulic fracturing, colloquially known as fracking. The process involves drilling horizontally as well as vertically, and then pumping a toxic cocktail of pressurized water, sand, and chemicals deep underground in order to break apart the rock formations that hold deposits of oil and gas.
Hughes found that the production rates at these wells decline, on average, 85 percent over three years.
"Typically, in the first year there may be a 70 percent decline," Hughes told VICE News. "Second year, maybe 40 percent; third year, 30 percent. So the decline rate is a hyperbolic curve. But nonetheless, by the time you get to three years, you're talking 80 or 85 percent decline for most of these wells."
Read more: https://news.vice.com/article/the-end-of-fracking-is-closer-than-you-think#ixzz3CtzrPlSb
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)....and we find out it's only a pipe dream.
djean111
(14,255 posts)I hope?
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)I have seen wind and solar attacked as more environmentally harmful than nuclear plants here, so just wondered.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)I hope you know me better than that.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)but often on message boards, it is hard to tell unless one uses the thingy.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Is that important?
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 10, 2014, 11:46 PM - Edit history (1)
And then leave the mess after all the money has been made.
We've seen this before.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Make sure the money flows immediately to the recipients (bonuses for the banksters, profits for the fracksters), and then walk away with the spoils, leaving the larger system to suffer, falter and fail. It's another example of how to externalize costs in the interest of greater profits.
PoutrageFatigue
(416 posts)But unless these greedy pricks have some off-planet resources we don't know about, they're poisoning their own future as well...hope that money tastes good, because you won't be able to eat the food once these frackers are done..