Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEnormous Carbon Capture Project Begins Construction In Texas (HOWEVER.......)
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/enormous-carbon-capture-project-begins-construction-texas?dom=PSC&loc=topstories&con=enormous-carbon-capture-project-begins-construction-in-texas
The Petra Nova system will collect carbon dioxide leaving an existing coal plant by spritzing the plant's exhaust with a chemical solvent. The purified carbon dioxide then gets compressed into a liquid and piped 80 miles away to an active oil field. Once there, the carbon dioxide gets piped underground, where it helps force oil to the surface. So, yes, Petra Nova captures carbon dioxide to help people mine ever more oil, which creates its own emissions once it's burned to make electricity.
That's not ideal, but experts who support such projects say they're a necessary step. Projects similar to Petra Nova, in the U.S. and elsewhere, have been stymied by their high costs, Yale Environment 360 reports. Petra Nova's engineers hope the system will eventually pay for itself because it's linked to increased oil production, the Houston Chronicle reports. That, in turn, could encourage other companies to adopt the technology and improve it.
Critics worry sequestered carbon dioxide will eventually find its way up to the surface of the Earth and back into the atmosphere, as NPR reported in 2012. Oil field-linked projects may also prove unhelpful to global warming in the long term, if it encourages people and nations to continue to use fossil fuels.
The project is expected to capture 1.6 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, which equals about 40 percent of one of the coal plant's units, the Houston Chronicle reports. The plant, called the W. A. Parish Plant, has four units.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 776 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Enormous Carbon Capture Project Begins Construction In Texas (HOWEVER.......) (Original Post)
groundloop
Sep 2014
OP
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)1. It's probably better than emitting
the CO2 directly into the air, but not much.
I wonder how the economics works out? Probably pretty complicated.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)3. The thing is they're using CO2 to pull up more hydrocarbons
Which of course will be turned into even more CO2. Plus there's no guarantee that the CO2 which is injected will stay in the ground.
hatrack
(59,584 posts)2. Yeah, that'll help!
Nihil
(13,508 posts)4. Another day of business as usual for the CCS scam.
> experts who support such projects say they're a necessary step.
It is a complete crock of shit and so are the "experts" who "support" it
(for the sake of their paycheck).
There is absolutely no benefit for the planet, for Nature or for humanity in general
with "projects" such as this, just greenwashed distractions & profit for the tossers
in charge.